Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule is PISSED


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mc52beast said:

Rhule has taken more responsibility for losses thru seven games than Rivera did the entire time he was here. 

Well judging by his reaction he's saying it isn't his fault that with a busted ass OL we put an injured mike Davis against a big boy with every route being a go route that take a while to develop when teddy was almost sacked the previous 2-3 plays. This wasn't on teddy and his team didn't give him any options. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Watching it live, it appeared they got instant pressure up the middle and sent extra guys hard off each edge.

If you know they're bringing pressure, which they typically always have in those situations, you gotta have a hot read or a quick outlet setup.  With them sending extra guys, you got to scheme someone open quick...  it looked to me, like Brady called something long-developing, the blocking failed, and that's why Teddy had nowhere to go.

They had a delayed DL that was a big boy that completely obliterated Davis into Bridgewater, with all go routes like I said. That is a recipe for disaster and completely on the coaches.

Def watch the replay. All the route were long developing go routes and Davis was killed into Bridgewater who was trying to step up in his pocket. There is no way he can be blamed and he couldn't just throw the ball away anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Zaximus said:

Imagine if they had Thomas and Sanders lol

Honestly, i said it elsewhere, but I really don't think the receivers matter in their system.  Payton and Brees are what makes it work.  Guys like Colston and Thomas would not be half the players they have been and are elsewhere...  their scheme is impeccable and Brees anticipation for where and when to throw it is otherworldly.  That's why I really didn't care about them missing Sanders and Thomas.  They might just make more happen after the catch, but the issue against NO is not being able to stop them completing the passes in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I don't see how that sack is on Teddy.  We've all seen our QBs thru the years dancing around and run backwards and take a huge sack when we can't afford to, but the pressure came off the side instantly and when he tried to step up Davis lost his block (hard to ask a RB to block a DL, anyway), and that is when the play ended.  I'll need to see a replay of it... perhaps he had more time than it seemed.

We've all seen playcalls where the ball is out immediately after the snap.  Surprised that wasn't the call.

Teddy is the last guy to be responsible for that sack.  He literally had 1 second to throw.  I was surprised that Brady didn’t call a screen or draw there just to gain 5-7 yards.  I get that Rhule is pissed.  But maybe instead of being pissed at a player he should be pissed at his OC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smithers said:

Teddy is the last guy to be responsible for that sack.  He literally had 1 second to throw.  I was surprised that Brady didn’t call a screen or draw there just to gain 5-7 yards.  I get that Rhule is pissed.  But maybe instead of being pissed at a player he should be pissed at his OC

Or himself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sack itself wasn’t all on teddy but it seemed like he could have lost fewer yards if he hadn’t kept backing up. The line just got overwhelmed, if that had been recognized quicker we could have lost fewer yards. But I’ve seen teddy and other qbs squirt out of that and save the play, so if that’s what he was trying to do I can accept that. But just backing up and giving away yards because you’re lost and incapable of assessing the situation is not (if that’s what happened).

 

I certainly don’t blame teddy for this loss. It was a good game. I blame the Saints. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

The sack itself wasn’t all on teddy but it seemed like he could have lost fewer yards if he hadn’t kept backing up. The line just got overwhelmed, if that had been recognized quicker we could have lost fewer yards. But I’ve seen teddy and other qbs squirt out of that and save the play, so if that’s what he was trying to do I can accept that. But just backing up and giving away yards because you’re lost and incapable of assessing the situation is not (if that’s what happened).

 

I certainly don’t blame teddy for this loss. It was a good game. I blame the Saints. 

He didn't keep backing up he was trying to step up in his pocket to launch a pass when Davis was mauled into him by #92.

In fact he gained 4 yards back or so after his original drop back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...