Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Maybe it's not as bad as it looks...


jerrya

Recommended Posts

It was a tough loss yesterday but if we look at our 3 losses, there are some real good positive signs for this team.

1.  The combined record of the 3 teams we loss to is 12 and 5.

2.  Each team has a major win over quality teams..Raiders over KC; Bucks over GB; and Bears over TB.

3.  In a couple of the losses we were very short handed with some key plays.

4.  We we in each game...not a blow out.

The next few weeks should be very interesting...hoping we get some players back and keep competing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were without Samuel, CMC, and just lost KK. The fans in us say we left a W on the field and to an extent that is true but we we played a tough ass game yesterday against a stellar defense. It was an excusable loss, some of the mistakes were not excusable but im not mad we didn't win per say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how bad it looks, in all honesty.  We knew going in the Bears had a strong defense.  The Bears always have a strong defense, but this year's looks pretty good by their own standards. 

If somebody would have told me two months ago that we could skip the first six games and they would give us a 3-3 for it, I'd have jumped on that in a heartbeat.

I said before the season began, the record was not how I was going to judge this team.  The fact that they have been competitive every week, look decent in areas that I thought they would be awful, have some young players that are showing real NFL potential, and have a coaching staff that does more than just fill out the starting lineup for the week is all good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SaltnPepper said:

Where will we get a QB to go to the Superbowl?

Dude, you are the most negative set of seasoning I have ever come across on message boards.

We get it: you don’t like Teddy. There, you don’t have to waste anymore time letting people know that bit of info. I just freed up 2 hours a day for you. Think what you can accomplish now. The world is your oyster!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jdr6000 said:

Dude, you are the most negative set of seasoning I have ever come across on message boards.

We get it: you don’t like Teddy. There, you don’t have to waste anymore time letting people know that bit of info. I just freed up 2 hours a day for you. Think what you can accomplish now. The world is your oyster!

I like Teddy a lot. 

He's a great asset as a mentor and could be our next DA.

Don't you miss the security of DA on the bench?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SaltnPepper said:

I like Teddy a lot. 

He's a great asset as a mentor and could be our next DA.

Don't you miss the security of DA on the bench?

I don’t. 
 

I like having a smart qb who makes plays with his head as much as he does anything else. He puts the ball where our receivers have a chance to make a serious play more often than not. This is something we haven’t had a in a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not from PFF but some other interesting metrics to chew on: This is actually tied to the playcaller and how often they call plays that - in theory - is supposed to make it easier for the offense and how effective they were. I will say that with Canales, this does seem to correlate with how we seem to be putrid running screens.  I believe this is how much a QB's overall performance is helped/hurt on plays that is meant to be thrown to a specific player. A rough visualization of pass yards that are more because of how far the QB threw the ball and more on the receiver.
    • I think I saw where Salah was interviewing with Vegas.  I think that would be the hire for them--but Brady's ego is now involved--he will pursue Vrabel, but I think Vrabel goes where there is a QB--NE. While on the subject, Brady is also trying to create a great situation for coach Bill, trying to steal him from UNC.  Not sure BB wants that, but BB will not take a job without a QB in place.  However, it seems odd that BB has gone recruiting (in my opinion he is avoiding the press) when he could halt these rumors if he wanted to--the rumor is hurting recruiting and the transfer portal, I would assume.  I think he is playing both sides a bit and will wait to see what numbers a team is going to throw at him.
    • In that situation it's gotta be Mykel Williams.  I hope Jalon Wlaker is there tho, that's my draft crush this year
×
×
  • Create New...