Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

TEDDY SUCKS

Proudiddy

By Proudiddy,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Teddy doesn’t suck. 

But when we play upper level defense you can tell he isn’t in the tier than Cam once occupied.    Meaning he isn’t a special QB.  He is an efficient JAG.  An Alex Smith.  And you can win with them.  If we would have had the Bears defense....we would have won for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, CRA said:

Teddy doesn’t suck. 

But when we play upper level defense you can tell he isn’t in the tier than Cam once occupied.    Meaning he isn’t a special QB.  He is an efficient JAG.  An Alex Smith.  And you can win with them.  If we would have had the Bears defense....we would have won for example.

Get out of here with that hateful take.

In all seriousness these are the types of games that will be milestones of development and there were positives today. If Teddy proves himself to be the guy to orchestrate such wins then all the better for everyone involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

Two games against legit defense this year against TB and now Chicago.  Both games Teddy single-handedly blew them.

Where are all the Teddy Bros now?  I'm pulling for the guy as our QB, but once again, his lack of mobility and then his convenient timing to become wildly inaccurate rears its ugly head once he finally has to face a legit defense.

If he is any sort of mobile or accurate today, we win.  

He is a game manager.  Period.  If you are depending on him to single handedly make big plays, you will lose. 

EDIT: So, now that the word "sucks" is removed, the point can be better made without people getting caught up on semantics.

Your first paragraph just completely turned me off because it's nit really credible. Teddy didn't singlehandedly lose anything today! That's simply untrue. If you want to be taken seriously, you have to at least appear to be analytical about the situation. There were drops, bad play calls and C- protection out there. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

Lance is a high risk high upside. But if he had a year to Learn behind teddy, that may be a good thing

Someone else can take that high risk with their first rounder.  Carolina takes studs isn’t he first round. 

At this rate give me that Florida TE or the Hurney magic LB 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Logic Newbie

Logic

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Delhomme was as good as you were going to get under John Fox. 

Fox didn't believe in franchise quarterbacks.

Yes indeed this is true. Fox and Hurney fell to the same philosophy that is guiding the team now. Acquire a mediocre QB/Game Manager and build a team around them that is greater than that player. If this happens then the sum total of the parts would elevate the team rather than the QB.

This is the same old Bobby Beathard way of building a team like he did with the Redskins. Guess who learned under Bobby...yep, our friend and GM Marty Hurney

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...