Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Im just going to say it.


Harbingers

Recommended Posts

Nonsense, paying Shaq didn't stop us from paying Bradberry. Ask the Saints how hard it would be to make that math work. We weren't that cash strapped and you can easily work the numbers to push the cap hit to the future even if you are. He wanted more than we thought he was worth, right or wrong. He's doing well in New York but our pass defense is also doing pretty good considering who we have and the injuries we have. I think it worked out ok for everyone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who said bradberry even wanted to be here? Do people not understand outside of a franchise tag a team can't control to much what a free agent player does. More than that what team who is rebuilding gonna dish heavy bucks like that? Bradberry wanted to be one of the highest paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Varking said:

They wanted to pay Shaq instead 

don't tell some on this board that, they believe those decisions have NOTHING to do with one another 

 

Even though ...we decided to pay one and ...not pay the other...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

That’s been the case just about every Sunday since he became a Panther

Idk I think he's regressed somehow, I remember when Luke was out circa ~2015 he took over MLB duties and actually did really good 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paying Shaq was the right move.

People are complaining about how bad Whitehead is and that he’s the weakest link on the entire team. Imagine having another Whitehead level linebacker playing next to him. 
 

Our corners have been solid and if Bradberry was here we never would’ve grabbed Douglas. 

If Whitehead wasn’t so damn bad our defense as a whole would be solid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Paying Shaq was the right move.

People are complaining about how bad Whitehead is and that he’s the weakest link on the entire team. Imagine having another Whitehead level linebacker playing next to him. 
 

Our corners have been solid and if Bradberry was here we never would’ve grabbed Douglas. 

If Whitehead wasn’t so damn bad our defense as a whole would be solid

Whitehead is the worst. What a disaster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, uncfan888 said:

Whitehead is the worst. What a disaster

I expected him to be solid against the run but he’s not even that.

He’s slow to react and diagnose plays and more often than not actually just gets in the way. Chinn is getting so many tackles because he’s cleaning up Whiteheads mess a lot of times. 

I’m hoping Rhule can bring Reddick in this offseason and kick Shaq to MLB 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...