Im just going to say it.

[TheCasillas]

Just now, Harbingers said:

Might I point you towards Boston.

what does that have to do with this conversation?

[TheCasillas]

2 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

I couldn't even tell that Shaq was activated today.

The bears played away from him. Majority of their touches were on the outside until late game with DM running the ball and not getting past the first level, into the stacked box where boston led the team with tackles.

[PleaseCutStewart]

In all honesty, with how much Bradberry would have helped our secondary, could you imagine how terrible our LB corps would be this year if we paid him instead of Shaq?

[Harbingers]

1 minute ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

In all honesty, with how much Bradberry would have helped our secondary, could you imagine how terrible our LB corps would be this year if we paid him instead of Shaq?

I bite my lip saying this but perhaps Rhule might have had more of a say in LB's if that were the case.

[ThPantherFan]

25 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Why did we not keep Bradberry. Douglas + Bradberry with Jackson on the alt/slot would have made our backend.

Don't know.  Money, attitude, could be a multitude of things.  I would like to have seen him stay.

[ForJimmy]

I don’t think Bradberry wanted to play here.

[Harbingers]

9 minutes ago, ThPantherFan said:

Don't know.  Money, attitude, could be a multitude of things.  I would like to have seen him stay.

It was all money, we paid shaq a huge sum, we still could have paid bradberry realistically but hurney didn't want to. Bradberry was known for not being that out loud person. so it can really be on his end. Perhaps he didn't want to be on a "rebuild" team but nothing Rhule or Tepper told the players that we know said we are rebuilding. 

[Mr. Scot]

My memory is vague, but weren't there some indications that Bradberry didn't want to be here?

[TheCasillas]

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

My memory is vague, but weren't there some indications that Bradberry didn't want to be here?

this is correct. He flat out said it on the Eisen podcast back in March

[Rags]

Because we were losing Luke and already have DJax.

This defense with Djax and Rasul > this defense with Rasul and James but Whitehead and some other bum

[Harbingers]

5 minutes ago, Rags said:

Because we were losing Luke and already have DJax.

This defense with Djax and Rasul > this defense with Rasul and James but Whitehead and some other bum

Rasul + Bradberry would have been probably the best CB alignment in the league.

[Rags]

1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

Rasul + Bradberry would have been probably the best CB alignment in the league.

I dont...think thats true.

But even still we'd unquestionably have the worst lb core in the leauge.

[mc52beast]

Another historic move by Hurney in throwing money at Shaq and letting Brad go. If Tepper doesn’t either get rid of Hurney or give him another title after this season I’m going to be pissed.

[LinvilleGorge]

Did Bradberry not want to be here or did he not want to be here for what we were offering? Honest question, not baiting. I don't know.