Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Winning Now Will Cost Us About 15 Years


SaltnPepper

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

The fact that Teddy defenders are comparing him to Jeff Hostetler and think they are proving a point is hilarious.

Tell me, what happened to the Giants after they gave the job to him??

They beat the Bills in the Super Bowl?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, SaltnPepper said:

You didn't read the OP.

I said Greenbay was an exception and that Panthers were an exception.

How many teams have won 2 superbowls in 15 years or less with 2 different QBs when the 2nd QB wasn't already on the same roster as the first?

And even though your question is clearly geared to preclude the 49ers add them to tue list as well since Steve Young was not a member of the 1982 49ers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SaltnPepper said:

And Trevor has a more impressive resume. So why would you assume less of him?

What’s more impressive? The lower completion percentage? Lower QB rating? Half the rushing yards in twice the games? Beating the Citadel, UNCC, Furman, Wofford, trash ACC teams and getting his ass handed to him in the national championship game? I like Trevor but he’s nowhere near as valuable a player as Cam was when he was drafted. You’re a prisoner of the moment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

And even though your question is clearly geared to preclude the 49ers add them to tue list as well since Steve Young was not a member of the 1982 49ers.

No bullchit. 

He was Montana's backup. 

He doesn't count.

Rodgers doesn't count either.

Try again.

I'll give you Baltimore but that's the low end of 12 years and the point is the average is at least 15yrs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

I haven’t said he’s so good or so bad. You, like many others, are missing the point — that superstar No. 1 overall pick QBs are far from a sure thing to take people to SB glory. Last 10 QBs who went No. 1 are a combined 0-2 in the SB. Trevor gonna do what they couldn’t? 

and how many qbs won a sb on their 4th team??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

What’s more impressive? The lower completion percentage? Lower QB rating? Half the rushing yards in twice the games? Beating the Citadel, UNCC, Furman, Wofford, trash ACC teams and getting his ass handed to him in the national championship game? I like Trevor but he’s nowhere near as valuable a player as Cam was when he was drafted. You’re a prisoner of the moment. 

We shouldn't feed the chuck, despite the handle I have already gotten past it.... Chucky will keep on until 2030 or so

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SaltnPepper said:

No bullchit. 

He was Montana's backup. 

He doesn't count.

Rodgers doesn't count either.

Try again.

I'll give you Baltimore but that's the low end of 12 years and the point is the average is at least 15yrs.

He was not JM's backup during the 1982 SB genius he wasn't on the team derp derp slurp.

I never even mentioned the Packers.

 

Redskins

Raiders 

49ers

 

Ravens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...