Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Things We Think We Think...


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

Like most I am pleasantly surprised with the team's growth all things considered, that was a good win from a team that has legit talent at the key positions...

Offense:

Even before the season I thought with the addition of a guy like Robby to legitimize the receiving corps and adding a fresh young mind at play-caller we'd be able to score with anyone as we could boast as good a skill group as anyone - CMC, DJ, Anderson, Samuel

The real surprise in the mix was Teddy, I liked him in MIN, and we saw him as a Saints back-up, but aside from Week 2 and even in that game, he's showing why he was also a 1st round QB to begin with, aside from the top of 2018 before Cam's injury our passing game hadn't been this crisp. Two weeks in a row Mike Davis has carried the load well, and is honestly reminiscent of Stewart, a thick short build that is hard to bring down. I hope we see a blend alongside CMC once he's healthy. 

Defense:

Defensively we were all concerned, but Rasul needs to be given some credit, he's allowed DJ to stick with the smaller quicker DBs, and has allowed Pride / Elder to play the nickel. Apple returning also adds depth / experience to that unit. Burris and Boston have been good as well, but the real surprise is how well the defensive line is starting to play once again Brown was in the opposing offenses backfield stuffing the run, and Burns and Matos continue to be as advertised, and to top it all off Chinn is starting to look like a DROY candidate, he is quite literally the definition of a ''swiss army knife'' he's been at safety, linebacker, and slot and has been impressive. 

As this unit continues to get more reps under them could we really be what the potential has shown these last two games? Phil Snow you son of ***** what you've started to mold is looking good, I'm not seeing 10 yard cushions on the perimeter, and I'm seeing a mix of coverage and pressure, with the Saints stumbling out the gate, the Falcons being much worse than expected, and the Buccaneers looking like just another good team, could we really make a push??

See me in a few weeks, but if we keep trending upward, we might **** and surprise some damn people!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The next 4 weeks are critical to the trajectory of the season.

The Falcons game next week is critical. Falcons are going to be desperate for a win against a team they typically own. The Panthers could end their season with a win. 

Then, the Bears are very beatable the week after that too. Foles or Trubisky, it doesn't matter. Both make mistakes and without Tarik Cohen, their offense lacks a game breaker.

Then we get a showdown with the Saints that could be one of the best games of the season for this young team. Will Joe Brady cook up a scheme to beat his mentor? Or will Payton have all the tricks up his sleeve to stop Brady's offense?

Then, the Falcons again on a short week in what will be a grudge match for one team.

It's going to be interesting. We could be 2-6 and wondering where it all went wrong. But come out of that stretch at 5-3 or 6-2, and you're competing for a playoff spot. I expect 4-4, with wins against the Falcons the second time and Bears, heading to a 7-9/8-8 season, but still showing promise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...