0-2 with CMC and 2-0 without CMC. Annnd here we go.

[kungfoodude]

I think the one thing that we should take away from seeing Davis and Bonnafon play the past two weeks.....we should never see another 40-50 touch game for CMC. 

We have guys that can spell him, so actually fuging use them and stop wearing the fuging tread off the tires.

[Diehardpanther02]

You don't win Superbowls without superstar players. CMC is a superstar player. We just need more surrounding him. Our backfield is deep.  We're gelling, finally. That's all it is.

Give it time.

[TrevorLaurenceTime22]

9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I think the one thing that we should take away from seeing Davis and Bonnafon play the past two weeks.....we should never see another 40-50 touch game for CMC. 

We have guys that can spell him, so actually fuging use them and stop wearing the fuging tread off the tires.

Davis does look good, with the way Brady schemes people open I would love to see CMC operate from the slot receiver postion, especially on the mid yardage to go downs.

[DeAngelo Beason]

If it were last year, I'd say it's because we were being forced to spread the ball around.  CMC's touches weren't off the charts in the first two games.  Reality is we played two pretty good teams and gave both games away.  

[*FreeFua*]

The real scary part about now being 2-2 and winning 2 games without CMC is...

The trade deadline is approaching and Marty Hurney is still our GM

[stbugs]

15 hours ago, jfra78 said:

CMC makes the team better, just not enough to warrant his contract

He does more than enough. He’s making offensive weapon money. Guys like Watkins get his level of money. Teams have plenty of money to pay their superstars, they always get paid on another level than the average guys.

If we can pay Short and Okung $27M and go 2-0  while they get a combined 1 tackle in 1 start, then we can pay CMC $13M a year over the first 3 years of the deal. It’s basically a 3 year $39M deal. Would you rather have Paradis for 3 years?

These threads are so dumb. When we give up 37 points, 14 of which were were in the last 4.5 minutes with decent sized leads that’s what wins games. If the D keeps improving, CMC will be a great weapon. When you were giving up 30 points a game the last year and a half, it makes CMC’s efforts seem useless and to a point the are, but so are everyone’s when you can’t ever hold an opponent from scoring.