Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New PFF Mock (Interesting Panthers Pick, new QB in top-15)


saX man

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

We also had the best QB we have ever had during the same time period.  So you shouldn't take a QB top 10?

If Lance is still there, you take him. I’m exhausted with defensive guys being taken early AF. Regardless if Parsons is a beast or not. If he’s so good, trade some picks from the next year for him. Boom. Problem solved. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rags said:

Seriously having command over the middle of the field is important.

I agree.

Important BUT not fundamentally game changing to the point you make it the very top priority of your draft when drafting that high. If you are drafting in the top 5 then your roster lacks talent at positions that have a greater impact on the game than linebacker. Ever seen a team with a solid qb, solid tackles and a solid pass rush draft top 5 without trading into it?

Note what I did not say. I did not say I would never take a lb first round. I said I would not take one top 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, nctarheelreincarnated said:

If Lance is still there, you take him. I’m exhausted with defensive guys being taken early AF. Regardless if Parsons is a beast or not. If he’s so good, trade some picks from the next year for him. Boom. Problem solved. 

I’m not a huge fan of using a top 10 pick on a LB either but I have a huge draft crush on Parsons, he’s that good.

However, I really hope we target Garrett Bolles and Haason Reddick in FA allowing us to then go Rosseau, Chase or Surtain/Farley (assuming the QB’s are gone). 

I can’t imagine us being in position to draft Sewell and it’s long overdue that we lock up the tackle positions. Bolles and Moton both at a solid age to hold it down for the long term future. 

I suggest Reddick so we can kick Shaq inside and it would allow us to use our top 10 pick on a position other than LB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

I’m not a huge fan of using a top 10 pick on a LB either but I have a huge draft crush on Parsons, he’s that good.

However, I really hope we target Garrett Bolles and Haason Reddick in FA allowing us to then go Rosseau, Chase or Surtain/Farley (assuming the QB’s are gone). 

I can’t imagine us being in position to draft Sewell and it’s long overdue that we lock up the tackle positions. Bolles and Moton both at a solid age to hold it down for the long term future. 

I suggest Reddick so we can kick Shaq inside and it would allow us to use our top 10 pick on a position other than LB

My question for you. If somehow, and this is a big IF. If Lance and Parsons are there, who do you take? 

I seriously am so fuging pissed there are so many bad teams in the NFL. We picked the wrong damn year to rebuild. So frustrating. The NFL being this bad, could set the rebuild back a while. 

Because next year, we won't be shitty enough to pick in the top 5 either. So, we probably won't be able to pick Spencer Rattler or Sam Howell. Just so stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, saX man said:

This guy is typically pretty tough on prospects and had a nice Morgan video:

 

That’s JT O’Sullivan, I’ve watched a fair bit of his videos. They’re a decent watch for sure. 

Completely agree with you on Mond and Newman. Not a fan of many of the QB’s this draft outside of Lawrence and Lance tbh. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, *FreeFua* said:

That’s JT O’Sullivan, I’ve watched a fair bit of his videos. They’re a decent watch for sure. 

Completely agree with you on Mond and Newman. Not a fan of many of the QB’s this draft outside of Lawrence and Lance tbh. 

Me neither. Curious to see how Trask continues this year. If there was any year for the Huddle posters to start watching CFB, this would be the year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, nctarheelreincarnated said:

My question for you. If somehow, and this is a big IF. If Lance and Parsons are there, who do you take? 

I seriously am so fuging pissed there are so many bad teams in the NFL. We picked the wrong damn year to rebuild. So frustrating. The NFL being this bad, could set the rebuild back a while. 

Because next year, we won't be shitty enough to pick in the top 5 either. So, we probably won't be able to pick Spencer Rattler or Sam Howell. Just so stupid. 

If Brady is not sold on lance then trade down.  Its that simple.  Trade the eff down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nctarheelreincarnated said:

My question for you. If somehow, and this is a big IF. If Lance and Parsons are there, who do you take? 

I seriously am so fuging pissed there are so many bad teams in the NFL. We picked the wrong damn year to rebuild. So frustrating. The NFL being this bad, could set the rebuild back a while. 

Because next year, we won't be shitty enough to pick in the top 5 either. So, we probably won't be able to pick Spencer Rattler or Sam Howell. Just so stupid. 

I know you’re not going to want to hear this but let’s see how Teddy progresses throughout the season first. 
 

However, if Teddy doesn’t turn into the guy I think he’s capable of becoming with time then it would be pretty damn hard to make the argument against drafting Lance if you think he can be ‘that guy’. So yah, if Teddy doesn’t keep progressing then we better take Lance if he’s there. Especially if it’s him or Parsons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

I know you’re not going to want to hear this but let’s see how Teddy progresses throughout the season first. 
 

However, if Teddy doesn’t turn into the guy I think he’s capable of becoming with time then it would be pretty damn hard to make the argument against drafting Lance if you think he can be ‘that guy’. So yah, if Teddy doesn’t keep progressing then we better take Lance if he’s there. Especially if it’s him or Parsons.

Okay. I'm with you. As most are, I'm over Teddy. You can tell he's not what we need him to be.

Also, my logic is keeping Teddy on. Having him mentor Lance. Because Lance isn't close to a finished product, he's RAW. We're gonna have to let him sit a while and get up to speed. So, it's a win/win for the fanbase if we draft him. Because Teddy is starting the year after regardless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

I know you’re not going to want to hear this but let’s see how Teddy progresses throughout the season first. 
 

However, if Teddy doesn’t turn into the guy I think he’s capable of becoming with time then it would be pretty damn hard to make the argument against drafting Lance if you think he can be ‘that guy’. So yah, if Teddy doesn’t keep progressing then we better take Lance if he’s there. Especially if it’s him or Parsons.

Yeah I get that and I am not going to go to the "is teddy good" argument.  Its too early in the morning but heres the thing.  The model now to win in the nfl is to do it with a qb on a rookie deal and using the rest of the salary cap to fill out with players that contribute up and down the roster.  We dont have that now.  We will not be able to do it on his current salary or the new one he is going to have to get if we decide he is the long term answer.  Thats a big factor for me in wanting to draft a rookie qb.  That and letting brady work with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Believe it or not, this player was drafted #1 overall in 2022. LG much like players not playing in bowl games and not doing combine drills, its maybe a new normal. Draft is more than college stats..... ITS more magic seeing eye future BS!!!1!11!  
    • https://support.google.com/admanager/thread/328566182/how-much-is-the-cancellation-fee-for-%F0%9D%99%BB%F0%9D%9A%9E%F0%9D%9A%8F%F0%9D%9A%9D%F0%9D%9A%91%F0%9D%9A%8A%F0%9D%9A%97%F0%9D%9A%9C%F0%9D%9A%8A
    • Could this be real or smokescreen  or Warren, come on down Panthers’ Canales putting emphasis on versatility as Carolina looks to evolve TE spot BY MIKE KAYE [email protected] 11hrs ago Dave Canales doesn’t want one-note tight ends in his offense. As the second-year head coach continues to evolve his playbook in Carolina, he’s prioritizing versatility at a key spot on the Panthers’ depth chart. While wide receiver upgrades have become a popular topic in the Queen City, especially on social media, the folks on Mint Street might have a better shot at improving their overall offensive attack with a facelift at tight end. With Tommy Tremble and Ian Thomas headed to free agency later this month, Ja’Tavion Sanders — last year’s fourth-round pick — is the only notable player under contract at the position in 2025. And the lack of solidified players on the depth chart offers up an opportunity to further craft the position in Canales’ image. The offensive play-caller painted a crystal-clear picture of that image last week at the NFL Scouting Combine. “Versatility and toughness, first and foremost,” Canales said. “We’re going to run the ball, so we certainly can’t just take receiving tight ends who give you no value in the run game. At a minimum, this has to be a guy that’s really tough. It doesn’t mean that he’s got to be the 260-pound bruiser that plays in-line. Those guys are cool, too, but if he’s going to be 235 pounds, he has to play with the level of violence because we are going to run the ball a lot. So the versatility is really important for me at the tight end.”   While the veteran free agency class isn’t particularly stocked with notable names that fit that standard, the NFL Draft, according to most media evaluators, has a plethora of those versatile talents, most notably Penn State tight end Tyler Warren. Canales sees a Swiss Army knife of sorts when he watches film the 6-foot-6, 261-pound playmaker. “I think he’s an incredible player,” Canales said. “I think speaking of versatility, here’s a guy that can play close to the interior and play physical because of his sheer size, but then, he does create some mismatches in the pass game, you can hand him the ball. So if you look at some of the teams that are using tight ends for QB sneak — that would be a weapon for somebody in a short-yardage situation to utilize him. So, he’s a very interesting prospect.” Warren — who is currently projected as a top-10 prospect by Pro Football Focus — produced 1,233 receiving yards, 218 rushing yards and 13 total touchdowns (including a passing score) last year for the Nittany Lions. He might be gone by the time the Panthers pick at No. 8 in the first round, or Carolina might prioritize another position with that selection And if the Panthers pass on Warren, they’ll still have plenty of strong options during the rest of draft weekend. Michigan’s Colston Loveland, Texas’s Gunnar Helm, and Miami’s Elijah Arroyo are all projected as top-100 picks. All three would add a playmaking threat to Canales’ offensive play-calling concoction. There’s also Tremble, whom both Canales and general manager Dan Morgan openly expressed desire in bringing back during their time at the combine last week.  Tremble dealt with nagging injuries throughout last season, but still produced a career-high 234 receiving yards. He also has the blocking and receiving versatility that Canales craves. But the Panthers want to make sure they get a fair deal done for both sides. Sometimes, that’s not as easy as it sounds. “Yeah, it’s a challenge, right? Because you want continuity,” Canales said. “Talk about a guy like Tommy Tremble. We’re going through all of our film and he does such a great job. So, now it’s all of a sudden it’s like, in all fairness, like, ‘Let’s let Tommy see what’s out there from a free agency standpoint.’ But for me it’s like, ‘OK, we have these guys that we’ve trained for a year, and you’d love to have them back.’” Sanders set a new franchise rookie record with 342 receiving yards last season. He also improved as a blocker from his college days. While he has shown he can be a key cog in the Carolina offense, the Panthers aren’t going to just settle for continuity, even if that’s seemingly a foundational priority for Canales. Bringing back Sanders and Tremble with minimal enhancement otherwise would be a disservice to the offense’s evolution. Canales knows that and Morgan knows that.
×
×
  • Create New...