What Arizona Cardinals fans are saying.

[jfra78]

Back to the OP

I've heard enough of what Zona fans are saying right here on our own board.

[KillaCamNewton]

jokes on all of you im from arizona and they dont have fans

[WarHeel]

While we are on cherry picking stats as it relates to Teddy and other QB, peep Murray’s stats.

Worse completion percentage and TD/INT ratio as it stands currently.

[nctarheelreincarnated]

5 minutes ago, WarHeel said:

While we are on cherry picking stats as it relates to Teddy and other QB, peep Murray’s stats.

Worse completion percentage and TD/INT ratio as it stands currently.

Didn't include his rushing stats though, did ya? Yeah, you include those, he's pretty damn good. 

[WarHeel]

1 minute ago, nctarheelreincarnated said:

Didn't include his rushing stats though, did ya? Yeah, you include those, he's pretty damn good. 

I’m speaking as it relates specifically to completion percentage, “deep passes,” and TD/INT. Seeing how we have the best RB in the NFL we don’t need TB to put up RB type numbers rushing to compensate.

[PantherOnTheProwl1523]

2 hours ago, nctarheelreincarnated said:

I didn't list any number 1 picks in the past 24 hours, I think you're thinking of another person. Jesus Christ. 

[Jon Snow]

3 minutes ago, Pantherfan84 said:

Your wrong. We was still getting picked to lose all the way up to the SB. 

No, actually he is right.

[Moo Daeng]

9 minutes ago, Pantherfan84 said:

Your wrong. We was still getting picked to lose all the way up to the SB. 

Your memory must be fuzzy.

18 of 20 picked Carolina. https://www.nfl.com/news/super-bowl-50-analyst-predictions-panthers-or-broncos-in-santa--0ap3000000632303

[jfra78]

12 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

Your memory must be fuzzy.

18 of 20 picked Carolina. https://www.nfl.com/news/super-bowl-50-analyst-predictions-panthers-or-broncos-in-santa--0ap3000000632303

Yes the superbowl they had us favored, but before that they didn't.  Experts had us losing to both Arizona and Seatle.  

[nctarheelreincarnated]

1 hour ago, WarHeel said:

I’m speaking as it relates specifically to completion percentage, “deep passes,” and TD/INT. Seeing how we have the best RB in the NFL we don’t need TB to put up RB type numbers rushing to compensate.

I was talking about Murray in general. Were at the day and age where you have to include a QB's running stats. 

[nctarheelreincarnated]

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

No, actually he is right.

Yeah, it's weird. They love when the website Owner brings his positive opinion, and not facts to an actual discussion. And post random gifs and poo like that. But my god, don't let me bring facts to a discussion. Nobody likes that, because I want us to get an actual QB and not waste a season winning games that don't matter. Sigh. 

[nctarheelreincarnated]

1 hour ago, jfra78 said:

Yes the superbowl they had us favored, but before that they didn't.  Experts had us losing to both Arizona and Seatle.  

I think they had us beating Seattle, at least. But yeah, most had Arizona winning I do believe. Especially after Zona beat GB. 

[nctarheelreincarnated]

1 hour ago, Pantherfan84 said:

We was first in power rankings probably. But we was picked against every week towards the end even being undefeated. Even every week in playoffs against Seattle, and Arizona both being at home. Might want to look again.

No we weren't picked against every week. Everyone thought we would beat the hell out of the Giants, Falcons, etc. But, okay. 

[WarHeel]

18 minutes ago, nctarheelreincarnated said:

I was talking about Murray in general. Were at the day and age where you have to include a QB's running stats. 

That’s fine but no one has made the argument for Teddy sucking at being a rushing QB. They are poking at his passing stats. So I gave an apples to apples comparison.