If the Panthers win on Sunday, they will be 2-2

[ClawOn]

2 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

If the Panthers win on Sunday, they will be 2-2

 

 

You serious Clark?

[Jeremy Igo]

14 minutes ago, ClawOn said:

You serious Clark?

[Varking]

2 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

We would be better off to lose fans that are angry about winning. Get this joint back to how it used to be, a fun place to talk Panthers. 

People here bash the poster, not the points. Until mods clean up stuff like that we aren’t going back to what it was years ago. 

[Hoenheim]

3 hours ago, Mother Grabber said:

2-2 is the next step on the way to 14-2

Or 2-14 and #1 pick 

[TheCasillas]

If we win this weekend, it will be because the defense created turnovers, and the offense did not. I really think it will be key.

Also, a couple of RZ TDs, haha.

[GoobyPls]

You can make a strong case he should be 3-0 same for 0-3. The raiders game came down to a stupid play call and the Bucs Teddy was off the whole game and still we had a chance to win. But on the other hand if the chargers complete that lateral 

[Moo Daeng]

2 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

You can make a strong case he should be 3-0 same for 0-3. The raiders game came down to a stupid play call and the Bucs Teddy was off the whole game and still we had a chance to win. But on the other hand if the chargers complete that lateral 

If you were watching the Raiders game you would know that the play in question was at the Raiders 46 yard line. We actually had to score a TD after that to make it a play the game "came down to"

[Varking]

28 minutes ago, Pantherfan84 said:

Yeah u deserve to be bashed when you say u want the team to lose to pick on the top 5. Damn you want to make a winning culture starting now. This team has played well and should be at least 2-1. I'm not going to bash my own team and set there on Sunday's to pull for them to lose. That's some of the dumbest sh!t I've heard of lol.

There’s a difference between bashing and being critical. Me not thinking we are going to win isn’t me rooting for the team to lose. I’m being realistic. This is an awful take. You say this is some of the dumbest poo you have ever heard of ( it should be dumbest poo I’ve ever read, but whatever ) but that just shows me you aren’t reading your own posts. 
 

Do you have to blindly believe Jimmy Clausen or Matt Moore were going to be saviors? That Kyle Allen was the long term future after four games? Cmon. 

[SmokinwithWilly]

I want to win, I really do. But i believe that comes with a price to high to bear. The more we win, the more likely we keep Marty Hurney as GM. 

Win games, keep Hurney. Lose games, lose Hurney. If it means hes gone for good, I'll be happy at 1-15.

[Varking]

7 minutes ago, Pantherfan84 said:

Yeah ok I'm dumb for pulling for my team to win lol. Wow

I didn’t call you dumb. Some of your posts are. I can cheer for Teddy to score while also believing that he isn’t going to dominate and have a 400 yard, 5 TD game. I wrote that your posts believing that I can’t be a fan because I think we are going to lose a game means I actively want us to lose games. 
I go to a game every year. When I’m not at the games I’m actively watching every week cheering and I do get upset when we lose. I also realize we are likely going to lose a lot of games this year and place us in range of a top QB in the draft. 

You can go through my post history before the season started where I said we could have a worse record this year despite being a better team because our schedule is brutal as well. 
 

I believe we are drafting high. That doesn’t mean I want us to lose. And you can’t find any post I have made where I have cheered the losing. That is a stupid thing to insinuate. You aren’t dumb but your posts accusing me of actively wanting the team to lose because I post that I don’t think we have a lot of wins in us... those are dumb. I’ve been on this forum for 10 years or so, never once hoped we were going to lose games. 

[Carl Spackler]

If we suck enough to get a high draft pick, we’ll get a good player. If we win too many games to get a high draft pick, we exceeded expectations. It’s a win-win. I’m good with getting one of the three QBs, Sewell or Parsons but I’m also good with being competitive and beating every team in our division for once. 

[Varking]

1 minute ago, Carl Spackler said:

If we suck enough to get a high draft pick, we’ll get a good player. If we win too many games to get a high draft pick, we exceeded expectations. It’s a win-win. I’m good with getting one of the three QBs, Sewell or Parsons but I’m also good with being competitive and beating every team in our division for once. 

Does Parsons slide Shaq over? Sewell should be the pipe dream for Cinci. They have their QB, still not winning and he’s getting hammered. Drafting high and they could get one of the best left tackles out of college in recent memory. If Teddy improves to the point he looks like the future but we keep losing Sewell would be the smart pick here, too. 

[Jesse]

[Carl Spackler]

7 minutes ago, Varking said:

Does Parsons slide Shaq over?

Probably. I’d want the smartest LB in the middle (vocal or not, Shaq has gotten better at calling out opponents’ plays) and the three-down playmaker on the outside.