Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Snap Counts


jfra78

Recommended Posts

 

https://www.panthers.com/news/snap-counts-panthers-at-chargers

Offensive

Player Offensive Snaps Special Teams Snaps
Taylor Moton 51 (100%) 7 (27%)
Chris Reed 51 (100%) 5 (19%)
John Miller 51 (100%) 2 (8%)
Matt Paradis 51 (100%)  
Teddy Bridgewater 51 (100%)  
DJ Moore 45 (88%)  
Robby Anderson 40 (78%)  
Mike Davis 39 (76%) 1 (4%)
Ian Thomas 35 (69%)  
Curtis Samuel 33 (65%)  
Trent Scott 31 (61%) 7 (27%)
Chris Manhertz 24 (47%) 7 (27%)
Greg Little 20 (39%)  
Seth Roberts 17 (33%)  
Pharoh Cooper 9 (18%) 7 (27%)
Alex Armah 7 (14%) 8 (31%)
Brandon Zylstra 2 (4%) 10 (38%)
Reggie Bonnafon 2 (4%) 9 (35%)
Colin Thompson 2 (4%) 4 (15%)

 

Defensive

Player Defensive Snaps Special Teams Snaps
Juston Burris 78 (100%) 9 (35%)
Jeremy Chinn 78 (100%) 7 (27%)
Rasul Douglas 78 (100%) 3 (12%)
Tre Boston 78 (100%) 1 (4%)
Shaq Thompson 66 (85%) 3 (12%)
Brian Burns 63 (81%) 3 (12%)
Stephen Weatherly 55 (71%)  
Tahir Whitehead 50 (64%) 2 (8%)
Efe Obada 43 (55%) 7 (27%)
Derrick Brown 42 (54%) 3 (12%)
Troy Pride 40 (51%) 14 (54%)
Corn Elder 40 (51%) 12 (46%)
Donte Jackson 38 (49%) 2 (8%)
Marquis Haynes 36 (46%) 5 (19%)
Zach Kerr 31 (40%) 8 (31%)
Yetur Gross-Matos 24 (31%)  
Bravvion Roy 18 (23%) 2 (8%)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I was pretty sure Trent Scott saw more snaps than Greg Little, but I was waiting for the official snap counts to confirm it.

More and more Little is looking like a bust of a pick.  I would settle for backup rotational guy at this point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WarPanthers89 said:

What is the deal with Little getting 20 snaps smh. I was looking for him all game and didn’t see him. He must be far off from ever being a starter.

If you get to rewatch the game, just look for a guy who seems lost and apparently doesn't know what he's doing.

That'll be Little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

It would be more telling to know the number of rotations Trent Scott got vs Little. Were they alternating? Did he simply get one more rotation and or have a few longer possions.  I'm not saying Little was this or that but the dynamics of the rotation matter.

Maybe alternating possessions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moo Daeng said:

It would be more telling to know the number of rotations Trent Scott got vs Little. Were they alternating? Did he simply get one more rotation and or have a few longer possions.  I'm not saying Little was this or that but the dynamics of the rotation matter.

It wasn't a rotation.

Little played the first quarter, then got sat down and didn't play again through the end of the half.

They gave him another shot the first few series of the third quarter, but the offense didn't start moving until they put Scott back in. He stayed in through the end of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It wasn't a rotation.

Little played the first quarter, then got sat down and didn't play again through the end of the half.

They gave him another shot the first few series of the third quarter, but the offense didn't start moving until they put Scott back in. He stayed in through the end of the game.

Yikes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It wasn't a rotation.

Little played the first quarter, then got sat down and didn't play again through the end of the half.

They gave him another shot the first few series of the third quarter, but the offense didn't start moving until they put Scott back in. He stayed in through the end of the game.

Fwiw, Scott was the one that got abused by Bosa on our last offensive snap.  Of course, it was Bosa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It amuses me how Goff's name the last few years is often used to compare to subpar or underperforming QB's. Now on the surface I get it. But when you look at his numbers he's been the same QB all along. He's improved his completion % but even with the Rams he averaged 63.4. And that Super Bowl he played in they should have won honestly. If we can get a QB as good as Goff I'll be pretty damn pleased.
    • And it remains to be seen if Goff has that ability or not. Plenty of very good QB's like Goff were not able to get over those playoff humps. Matt Ryan, Kirk Cousins, etc. You can still be an upper tier QB and never get over that hurdle. McVay just thought(and hasn't been wrong yet) Goff was never going to be that guy.
    • You literally simply have to think logically for either of those guys. Smith is locked up on a deal for 2025, so we would have to trade for him or he gets cut. Neither of those scenarios are likely in the first place.  Wilson will be 37 in 2025. Why on earth would he have any interest in a situation that is far worse than he was given in Denver and wasn't able to win there? He's a guy that can drop into any ready to win franchise in the NFL and immediately elevate their chances of winning(provided they already have QB issues).  Frankly, that is either speculation that even David Newton should be embarrassed by or it shows how disconnected with reality some people in our organization are.   I do agree with him on getting a veteran QB, however. That's our best chance to keep developing our talent.
×
×
  • Create New...