Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Chargers Gameday Thread

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TrevorLaurenceTime22 Grand Master

TrevorLaurenceTime22

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Double Trouble said:

Really hard to tell and depends on who is ahead of us.  Broncos will probably be the main competition.  There are oddly a lot of teams that could wind up ahead of us that don't necessarily need a QB. It will be a unique draft in my opinion.  

Jets I imagine will definitely go QB, Giants may as well and definitely the Broncos in the same hand we could pick 5th and all three gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Double Trouble Collaborator

Double Trouble

Posted
Posted
Just now, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Jets I imagine will definitely go QB, Giants may as well and definitely the Broncos in the same hand we could pick 5th and all three gone.

Agree I said that with the assumption Jets take Lawrence. I don't see the Giants bailing on Daniel Jones in a season with no Saquon and that OL. Sewell would 100% be the pick if he is there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TrevorLaurenceTime22 Grand Master

TrevorLaurenceTime22

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Double Trouble said:

Agree I said that with the assumption Jets take Lawrence. I don't see the Giants bailing on Daniel Jones in a season with no Saquon and that OL. Sewell would 100% be the pick if he is there.

I wouldn't hate Sewell and the best center available in round 2 building an elite oline with CMC and weapons can get you pretty far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dragoon11 Rising Star

Dragoon11

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, Snake said:

What a terrible defense. 

Yeah, this game should not have been this close, poor red zone offense, lack of a consistent pass rush, poor tackling. Chargers were 4 for 4 on 3rd down on their last TD scoring drive, defense just cannot get off the field. The bend but don't break thing may work against a team like this, but not against better teams. Brian Burns needs to put on about 15 pounds of solid muscle, because the only way he gets pressure is with speed around the edge, that's his ONLY move, for the most part he gets manhandled. Our linebackers... don't even get me started. Shaq is just an average linebacker AT BEST. We really miss Kuechly and Davis, it's blindingly obvious. One bight spot... Jeremy Chinn looks like a star in the making.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Double Trouble Collaborator

Double Trouble

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

I wouldn't hate Sewell and the best center available in round 2 building an elite oline with CMC and weapons can get you pretty far.

Probably an unpopular opinion but I'm a Darnold believer. Sewell in the first, OG/OC in second and trade the third for Darnold. However, I think it will take a second to get Darnold.

 

Edit: And I think Sewell goes before Fields. So not a realistic scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...