Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Video: A closer look at sacking Teddy


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Here are three sacks that the Carolina Panthers gave up to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. 

 

#1

giphy.gif

This is a coverage sack. The only open receiver during this play is Seth Roberts but Roberts never even looks for the ball until he is 30 yards down field and Teddy is in the dirt. 

The fumble is on Teddy. He has to protect that ball better. 

#2

giphy.gif

It doesn't get more obvious than this one. Suh treats Miller like a training sled and pushes him directly into Teddy. Not great, but Suh is a good player and will do this from time to time. 

 

#3

giphy.gif

This is on Okung. Notice he is by far the last one to react to the snap. Everyone else is almost a full step into the play by the time he gets out of his stance. The play is over in the .5 seconds Okung failed to react. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were single blocking Suh there, zero help, not even a chip.  All things considered, Miller did a decent job directing Suh toward the pile of players on the left of the line.  Teddy could have done a little better stepping up there.  It's not like this was a blind side pressure.

On that last one, even if Okung got his man, Moton and Miller got beat by a stunt there.  End came crashed inside and Moton followed him while Miller got caught in the wash.  The DT (looked like Suh) was free to the QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Miller doesn't look good in any of those.

In the second one, Matt Paradis is already turned in the direction he's going to go before the snap and leaves Miller to single block Suh (with predictable results).

On the third, I'm not sure if it's bad technique or just a reaction to how fast the rusher gets off, but Okung is already turned around a fraction of a second into the play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fox007 said:

Yea our OL is poo and has been poo for what 10 years now...doubt anyone would moan if we drafted a QB with our top 3 pick then OL the rest of the way.

OL QB OL OL OL OL OL - Can't keep doing the same thing and expecting different results. Line is a much bigger concern for us than the QB position.

Why get Grade A steak if you're just gonna throw it in a meat grinder? Might as well get some chuck, because you're just gonna end up with a burger anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Captroop said:

OL QB OL OL OL OL OL - Can't keep doing the same thing and expecting different results. Line is a much bigger concern for us than the QB position.

Why get Grade A steak if you're just gonna throw it in a meat grinder? Might as well get some chuck, because you're just gonna end up with a burger anyway.

If we aren't in a position to take a QB, let's just draft 7 offensive linemen and call it a draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Side note on #3, Bridgewater probably would have gotten his fuging head taken off by Suh on that stunt even if Okung had blocked well.

"Man, it's a good thing our QB was already sacked or else he would have been sacked more violently."

Yeah no, our O Line is doing just swell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...