Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3-3-5 and are we wasting burns?


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

Personally for me im a schematics guy. I love to pressure the qb so I was in favor of the 3-4. The 3-3-5 is great at stoping the pass but at the expense of getting gashed in the run as we are.  And its only good against the pass if you have the horses to make it work. We picking up "horses" from the waiver wire on top of not really having a number 1 cb. That spells disaster for this defense already.

We are the only nfl team without a single sack..  not 1. How is that possible??? For me I love burns.. is he perfect no.. he isn't a positive in the run game and brings 0 to the power rush department. But as a speed rusher there are maybe only 5 or so guys that are better in that department if you as me. So why is he either not on the field or out in the flats on coverage assignments so often? 

I wanted to take a few to post some thoughts on Brown as well. I was never in the corner of taking a nose tackle so high when you have a gaping hole in the pass rush. He is pretty good at what he does so far... but is it top 7 good? Meh... seemed like a luxury pick to me like you can go nose if you have all the other important pieces in place like qb,LT, edge, cb, and then you can choose between say specific only positions like nose,middle,lb and so on. 

Just my early season thoughts and ramblings... im sure many wont agree and I could be wrong but this is how I see thing right now. With the loss of cmc for a few weeks I think we should fully embrace the tank mode and accept it for what it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We were very good at rushing the passer at the expense of not being able to stop the run at all last year. IMO, so far this iteration is preferable to that. Then again, we haven't faced an elite QB yet who doesn't need the assistance of a walker on the field, so we'll see if that holds up.

2019

Team Defense: 31st

Passing Defense: 13th

Rushing Defense: 29th

Scoring Defense: 31st

2020

Team Defense: 27th

Passing Defense: 12th

Rushing Defense: 19th

Scoring Defense: 27th

 

It's better. Definitely not much, but it is better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We were very good at rushing the passer at the expense of not being able to stop the run at all last year. IMO, so far this iteration is preferable to that. Then again, we haven't faced an elite QB yet who doesn't need the assistance of a walker on the field, so we'll see if that holds up.

It's not like we're stopping the run very well this year... Jacobs and Fournette (yuck) absolutely gashed us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would guess in a 3-3-5 Burns is basically a Dlineman that stands up labeled as a LBer, moves around to favorable matchups and shouldn't be covering poo unless the DC is trying to get unnecessarily cute. The question there is who are the 3 upfront? I wouldn't mind building it but to expect bodies to fill spots based on pure theory makes me look to last year and doubt we could pull it off without a full 2 seasons to build it right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly they should probably trade Burns now when someone might be willing to give up a nice DP. Typical tweener guy who is a 3-4 edge rusher. Doesn’t fit our scheme. I didn’t love the pick to begin with and FSU ends don’t have a very good track record in NFL. Marty didn’t learn his lesson with Everette Brown. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NCBlu said:

3-3-5  will not work in the NFL teams will just run all over you. Could not believe when i seen that on 1st downs and guess what they ran right at it.

Agree, it’s a college defense. Might work against Rutgers, Indiana, and TCU but it is not a defense for the NFL. I can’t believe we are even having this conversation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our run defense looks better and that’s with Whitehead instead of Luke. Our defensive line is much better at stopping the run that it was last year. It’s how we were able to get back into the game against the Raiders and the Bucs. We need a MLB and safety and we might have a good young defense next year. They should really try Shaq and MLB and Chinn/Carter on the outside. Shaq can’t be worse than Whitehead and it will let a better player like Carter get on the field in his place...

I kind of like Burris & Chinn at safeties, Douglas & Pride on the outside, Jackson at NB, with Shaq at MLB and Carter at OLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...