Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Sunday Night Football thread - Pats at Hawks

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

TrevorLaurenceTime22 Grand Master

TrevorLaurenceTime22

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Yaboychris28 said:

You might be right. At least their designed runs and not getting destroyed in the pocket hits like they were in Carolina for so long 

In the pocket or running its still wears down the human body... its something I've always been amazed with by Wilson he just doesn't take those monster hits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ichigo1057 Experienced

ichigo1057

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, CRA said:

He explained it before.  When he runs a lot he gets tired.  He rests.   But teams figured that out.  Late in games he thought he was tipping his hand to opponents in terms of how he was feeling.

Then he started kneeling like that every snap and getting up slowly from the start so teams wouldn’t know when he is tired. 

Thanks for the info as well. I never saw that interview so was just kind of curious. It's a smart move though. Don't want to tip off the defense that you might not be at 100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Shotgun said:

Whoever was responsible for the Cam/Teddy decision should be fired. Like tonight, I dont care who it was. 

It was Tepper. Good luck with that. Do you know any females who have been around him enough to accuse him of sexual misconduct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Logic Newbie

Logic

Posted
Posted
Just now, Shotgun said:

Whoever was responsible for the Cam/Teddy decision should be fired. Like tonight, I dont care who it was. 

From what I understand it was Marty that presented the option and Joe Brady made the choice to work with Teddy. It had nothing to do with Cam and had more to do with getting the new OC comfortable with calligraphies the plays with someone that knew the offense already.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...