Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Impact of no preseason games


NAS

Recommended Posts

As teams make their final cuts, it will be more difficult for teams to sign players who were released or placed on practice squad due to lack of preseason games. I think this hurts the Panthers more than most because our team is desperate for depth, especially on defense and special teams.

I think teams should have been given a two week extension to finalize a 53 man roster and use the first two regular season games as additional opportunities for player evaluation 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basing a roster off of practice production scares the hell out of me. Preseason games are not regular season games but at least the roster evaluation from in-game situations and against another team is a huge loss IMO. For a new and unproven staff this could be a hell of a handicap.

Edit: Also giving the new staff a couple of trial runs before being in a regular season game would have been a huge positive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Basing a roster off of practice production scares the hell out of me. Preseason games are not regular season games but at least the roster evaluation from in-game situations and against another team is a huge loss IMO. For a new and unproven staff this could be a hell of a handicap.

We are getting a bigger handicap than most because of the new coaching staff. At the same time, our depth was probably always going to be shaky given the amount of roster turnover. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

We are getting a bigger handicap than most because of the new coaching staff. At the same time, our depth was probably always going to be shaky given the amount of roster turnover. 

Not just who makes the roster but how they are used and where they play. We had a joint practice and preseason last year and we still started Williams week one. That was an avoidable mistake. This year? Who knows, like literally who could know. I completely agree about the depth but starting week 1 without preseason games and a new staff? This could have the makings of a clusterfug. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Not just who makes the roster but how they are used and where they play. We had a joint practice and preseason last year and we still started Williams week one. That was an avoidable mistake. This year? Who knows, like literally who could know. I completely agree about the depth but starting week 1 without preseason games and a new staff? This could have the makings of a clusterfug. 

Yeah, I wouldn't expect to see a win for at least the first 4-6 games. But, we kind of knew that was a possibility even without the loss of preseason games. I just hope we see the coaches and players not look lost. Other than that, I am pretty much expecting the worst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I wouldn't expect to see a win for at least the first 4-6 games. But, we kind of knew that was a possibility even without the loss of preseason games. I just hope we see the coaches and players not look lost. Other than that, I am pretty much expecting the worst.

The Raiders could drop a win in our lap but yeah, I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, think about all the overreacting on this board we have missed out on from not having preseason. If the team looked good, some would have been predicting playoffs by now while others would have screamed that preseason does not matter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Qbs aren't defined by physical abilities.  
    • https://philpeople.org/profiles/will-coinbase-refund-money-coinbase-1 https://philpeople.org/profiles/will-coinbase-refund-money-coinbase-1 https://philpeople.org/profiles/will-coinbase-refund-money-coinbase-1 https://philpeople.org/profiles/will-coinbase-refund-money-coinbase-1 https://philpeople.org/profiles/will-coinbase-refund-money-coinbase-1 https://philpeople.org/profiles/will-coinbase-refund-money-coinbase-1 https://philpeople.org/profiles/will-coinbase-refund-money-coinbase-1
    • If we are going to spend the money anyway, maybe the signing is not as bad as it seems.  Mays outperformed Corbett (before his injury and if you go back to last year, Corbett has been below average) and then Christensen took the job and Mays quickly took it from him and never looked back.  He could use improvement reaching to the next level (LBs) but picking up stunts and blitzes---he was surprisingly good.  Run blocking needs some work, but he is 25.  Corbett, in my view, should be G/C depth and if Mays steps back, he is there.  Mays should start because this team is building for the future and 30 year old players are not building blocks.  We shall see.  That is how I think about it, but there are many factors we do not know. Having said that, I like what Zavala is doing, and I do not want to bring in someone who would take opportunities away from him.  Zavala was really good at RG down the stretch, and in limited duty, was awesome. In fact, we have a guard from the PS who played briefly and did well, but he only played a few plays.  He is 25 and I recall that fans of his former team were upset when we signed him.   Maybe as the backup center only (Corbett).  You need 2 centers to run practices efficiently.  I cannot say enough about the OL coaches on this staff.  What they have done is overshadowed by the Lewis / Hunt signing.  Mays, Ekwonu, Zavala--impressive growth.
×
×
  • Create New...