Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fans at games?


KillaCamNewton

Recommended Posts

Sorry if this has already been addressed and mods please move this if it has but has the team/NFL come to any sort of procedures for allowing fans at games? The first game is already just 2 weeks away. I got an email a little over a month ago and renewed PSLs/season tickets this season but not sure if anyone has come to any sort of decision yet. Any insight is appreciated. Only thing Ive seen all summer is the system Clemson put in place with the fans being spread out throughout the stadium

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

Lmao ain’t gonna be no fans at games as long as the stadium is in NC under Cooper.

Tennessee is wayyy more open than NC and they wont even have fans at games.

I just got back from nashville and they are even worse than NC.  Police ticketing if not wearing a mask in public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, chknwing said:

I just got back from nashville and they are even worse than NC.  Police ticketing if not wearing a mask in public.

Id love to see that. Like parking, seatbelts and speeding but with a more direct tie to the safety of the population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Happy Panther said:

I don't think that would be a very successful lawsuit...

Do you think in this environment that winning or losing matters. Cooper has been sued for not opening up so why wouldn't he get sued if he opens up some industries over other. I didn't say suing the state is the right thing to do simply it would lead to more lawsuits. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Do you think in this environment that winning or losing matters. Cooper has been sued for not opening up so why wouldn't he get sued if he opens up some industries over other. I didn't say suing the state is the right thing to do simply it would lead to more lawsuits. 

Successful is the key word. People file lawsuits all the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Happy Panther said:

I don't think that would be a very successful lawsuit...

Without getting political if i owned a bar or gym and was bleeding from being closed for 5 months and saw police/government allowing gatherings like the protest in Raleigh on Friday i would be suing out the ass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, panthers55 said:

Do you think in this environment that winning or losing matters. Cooper has been sued for not opening up so why wouldn't he get sued if he opens up some industries over other. I didn't say suing the state is the right thing to do simply it would lead to more lawsuits. 

Yeah but you said for discrimination. Which involves race, sex and religion. But anyway I think we have shown that the state can order some businesses open and some closed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...