Curtis Samuel - Catch or no Catch?

[Jeremy Igo]

Well?

 

[BlackCats2013]

Looks like a TD to me

[Toomers]

From that.......yes. 

[TheCasillas]

Elder being in the right place or pass could of been better placed? Up to you guys.

[Gregg S]

Ball secure in his hands behind his head, both feet in-bounds, ball never touches the ground.  TD

[LinvilleGorge]

G

6 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Elder being in the right place or pass could of been better placed? Up to you guys.

Not a great pass. Elder wasn't in position to defend a well thrown pass. Still though, it's a TD. Doesn't really matter how or why.

[Wolfcop]

Touchdown

[Waldo]

The refs would have to weight that against who we were playing to determine if it was a catch or not...always not I presume. 

It was an awesome catch. Lots of disappointing WRs over the last 20 years but I still think Samuel takes the next step with this crew. Watching him go deep and be open last year knowing we couldn't get him the ball was beyond frustrating. 

[NCBlu]

Nope ball hit ground after the catch. When going to the ground out of bounds i think you have to maintain possession all the way thru.

[Basbear]

During a NFL game, the refs would call that  "NO GOOD".

 

Im about 70/30 no catch too, looked like part of the ball touched the ground without his hand being under. Hell of a effort by Samuel and Corn too. 

[LinvilleGorge]

The ball can touch the ground as long as the receiver never lost control. Looked to me like he controlled it throughout, but the NFL can't ever determine what is or isn't a catch so the only real answer is "who the fug knows?"

[Stickman2]

Was one cheek in bounds ?

[philit99]

3 hours ago, Gregg S said:

Ball secure in his hands behind his head, both feet in-bounds, ball never touches the ground.  TD

Clete Blakeman says no.

[PhillyB]

no