Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Electrical help


The Watcher

Recommended Posts

So after a recent storm, and very close lightning strike we have three outlets that won't work.

The strike fried a few things, our garage door opener among them (had to replace the whole unit.) It tripped a few other GFCI lines, but they all reset.

One of the three dead ones is a GFCI outlet on the front porch. The other two are regular receptacles inside the garage, on the porch side, and have stickers saying that they are fed from a GFCI line.

My assumption is that they are all on the same breaker/line. What I assume is the correct breaker in the panel is labeled as "Garage Recepts." It is not tripped, and I tested it in the panel and it is putting out around 120 Volts like it is supposed to. It is a regular 20A breaker.

I bought a new GFCI outlet for the porch and replaced it. It won't reset, and I still can't get power to any of the three outlets.

Suggestions? Short in one of the other two regular receptacles? Bad new GFCI off the shelf? Burnt up wire?

This is the only GFCI outlet we have outside, and the only other outside outlet is a normal one, and it has power.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, cookinbrak said:

Hook up the GFCI without hooking up the line side. If it doesn't trip, hook up the other outlets one at a time to isolate where a short could be. (Don't unhook everything, just the hot wire. Check the GFCI, then the first outlet, then the second.)

Hi there.

This confused me a little. The old GFCI was wired to the line side, so that's how I hooked up the new one. The on-receptacle GFCI breaker won't reset. In fact, it doesn't seem like I even have hot power to the wires going to the outlet.

That made me think there was another GFCI somewhere upstream between this outlet and the breaker in the panel. The problem there is that I don't see/can't find anything else not working besides these three outlets.

Shouldn't the GFCI be the first outlet on the line, if it indeed feeds/protects the other two in the garage that are dead?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

I don't know why I said line, it's line in, load out. Just hook up the gfci and make sure it works. Then you can start isolating and tracing.

I'm actually starting to think it might be a bigger problem. Something in the in-wall wiring burnt up, or something incorrectly wired from the time it was built.

I can't recall every using the outlets on that side of the inside of the garage, but I am sure we have. I know for a fact that the GFCI on the porch worked before the lightning strike. It is just weird that all three are now out, and I can't get the new GFCI outlet to reset/have power.

There is only three wires in the GFCI box. A hot, neutral, and ground. When I unhooked the old one, it was hooked up on the line side, so I hooked it back up the same way when I put the new one in.

It doesn't seem like I've even got power to the back of the outlet. The GFCI won't reset, so I put the tester up to the wires on both sides of the outlet and it isn't showing any voltage coming in.

If the GFCI is indeed on the circuit that the other two receptacles in the garage are on, shouldn't it be feeding them via the load, or at least more than three wires in the GFCI box? Could the breaker show good in testing, even if it was bad? (I tested the post on the breaker and the ground/neutral strap in the panel, and all breakers show around 120v)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I need to redo my sub then.  Didn't realize that
    • Here is how I see it. I haven't read through all the comments so it has probably been said. We had ONE way, just one single way to win that game against the Bills. With us having a QB who decided he wanted to switch teams real quick, the only chance (and yes, still a small chance) to win that game was run the ball, with one of top, most violent RB's in the league, down the throat of one of the worst defenses in the league. You start the first play and you keep doing it until the final whistle. Doing this keeps the ball out of the hands of our QB who forgot what he was supposed to be doing that day. It keeps the ball out of the hands of a solid offense you would have to stop. You run the ball with the guy who gets more yards, which in turn should net you more points (I think Dave forgot that getting more yards is better than less yards though, so I hope someone let him know this after the game). Running the ball also can eat up the clock if successful. So the only way we win is a slow, methodical low scoring game where we own the time of possession. What does Dave do? The exact opposite of all that. Dave honest the god, took the best gameplan you  could use, a gameplan any 10 year old that only watches every other game would know to use, that every single fan knows you had to use, Dave's gameplan was to do the exact opposite of that. Dave thought it is better to use a RB that would net you way less yards than the other. Someone will have to explain why it is better to 1/3 the yards you could get (explain why a 4 yard gain is better than a 12 yard gain.) I honestly dont know why less yards is better. It seems like some are saying guys are happier and have more fun the following Monday if they lose but someone is happier because they got to run more? That confuses me. Dave decided instead to put the ball in the hands of a QB who would forget which way they are going down the field, and that's the game has a timer, which ends when the timer goes to zero. Not only does Dave decide to play the players that do worse in practice and games, he will avoid the plays that would seem to have the most chance of success, he decides to keep to the plays that don't work. In orher words, if history shows the play would yield success, you dont use that play. If you have been using a play that does not work at all, that means you should not use any other play except the ones that dont work. Dave will have to explain that strategy also because I don't understand it.  And finally, those who actually watch the whole game can see it, Dave Canales shows an immense amount of fear. He was scared to death of the Bills. You can't get that from the box score. You also can't understand just how much his fear contributes to the loss. Thats why people who say it was all Dalton just don't have the mental capacity to judge, or did not watch at all (only looked at numbers). For example, I think it was the second drive (maybe forth). Dave stopped a touchdown, it was all him. Rico does what Rico does (made Dave look dumb by showing more yards are better than less) and busts out something like a 40 yard run. Things are rolling. Instead of keeping the drive rolling Dave said "hold up, less points are better than more points...i have to stop this." So he pulls out a play so dumb that it leaves the place in shock. He puts Dalton out wide where everyone knows he is worthless, making the decision that we are onlying using 10 players this play, and we don't feel like have a QB at the moment....the perfect time for wildcat (because we are cats too). Its executed exactly as Dave hoped for, flawlessly...a loss of yards. Booyah. Things looking good. Now it's time to put it in Dalton's hands to seal the deal. It goes off perfectly. Buffalo gets the ball. Dave proves he is a genius. I guess I was wrong about him...
×
×
  • Create New...