How good is the panthers offense

[Auspanther]

3 hours ago, Mister said:

This offense has potential to be one of the best offenses in panthers history. We have an mvp in Christian mccaffrey, we got the most dangerous receiving core in the nfl , bet you can’t name a better starting 3 then dj Moore , Robby Anderson and Curtis Samuel and now add in a hungry Ian Thomas which has shown potential in the past and I think he will be a break out player. Our offensive is an upgrade over last year only weak point is Pardis in my opinion, Turner was a bad loss but we won That trade because a solid lt is worth more then a solid guard and we upgraded the left tackle spot while added Competition to the guard position right tackle we are solid with Taylor moton . Qb is an upgrade not only over Kyle Allen but cam newton . Teddy Bridgewater is a better qb and a better passer then cam . Sure we all love cam because of 2015 but he was not an accurate passer and not as good fit for Matt rhules pass friendly offense that’s based on timing and accuracy, cam is a big arm and a running qb so it wouldn’t work out anyway. 
and the best of all people keep forgetting we have 2 of the best offensive minded coaches from college football in rhule and joe Brady ! They will out scheme a lot of the coaches and will rely on analytics. This is going to be a fun offensive team this season . No doubt about it . We’re not rebuilding this is a playoff team people keep hyping up Tampa and New Orleans but there qbs are old and overrated . We have major potential to surprise the whole nfl and become that next dynasty . I’m expecting a season like the rams had a couple years ago when Sean mcveigh first game . I think we’re a similar team to them . 

So many flaws in this... the best trio of wide receivers ? Are you high?

bridgewater better than cam ? Please

[Peon Awesome]

There's potential. But there's also potential that the o line underperforms with new starters at 3 of 5 positions and Bridgewater reverts to mediocrity outside of the Saints infrastructure, and we end up below average. I truly hope not but I think it's nearly as likely as our offense being truly elite in 2020. Depends on how well our line performs and how much Brady's scheme really translates. I'm hopeful but hardly confident

[methodtoll]

Patience will be key for fans because Rome wasn't built overnight. This is a brand new offense with several new players mixed with current ones so obviously it will take time to gel but I think given time, they will. 

[onmyown]

No olineman except Moton. Some of you need to accept williams and Paradis are done and Little unfortunately probably is too. Larsen and Daley and the new pick ups are quality depth but not starters. It’s going to take a couple years to fix the line. This year it’s still patchwork...even with the deepest oline draft in a long time. 
 

I can only have faith Rhule will address it in the rebuild to come but damn if the Panthers have had no clue how to assemble an oline, failing over and over...is that worse that blantantly ignoring it? We’re still paying m Kalil when I could have filled in and produced better for a fraction of the cost so I say yes

[BurnHurnBurn]

I see speed on the outside, a questionable line that is softest up the middle, a QB with a quick release, a TE, and the best RB in franchise history+.

What does that mean?

Optimist: Line is a bit weak, hide it with quick passes and screens.  Use the speed on the outside for YAC by getting them the ball out wide quickly. It resembles a young NE offense, methodical, creative and effective.

Pessimist: Line is still incomplete since Gross retired. The middle is horrifying, Anything past a 3 step drop is gonna end up as a defensive highlight. The Offense resembles a Cam Newton-less Carolina offense, small, unsettled, and "oh poo, give it to CMC!"

[jfra78]

I feel our offense will be better than last year, not top 5 tho

[kungfoodude]

12 hours ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

I think it's going to be a really fun offense.  A really good one?  Yeah I'll wait and see on that until we get a look at the OL. 

That is still a big concern because Bridgewater's sack rate in Minnesota and New Orleans was very high.

[Mr Mojo Risin]

Idk what's harder to believe, that the OP has an IQ over 50 or that this dribble drabble articulated post got pied 7 times. This website never ceases to amaze me

[CRA]

12 hours ago, Mister said:

He’s a better qb then cam as of now . Cams biggest threat was his deep pass but he doesn’t have that anymore . I love cam but we have an upgrade at qb. Teddy is a lot smarter at reading coverages as well and finding the open receiver cam was terrible at finding the open receiver and you can watch old tape were someone was so wide open and cam would force it to a different receiver  

Teddy is better than Cam working the field from behind the line of scrimmage - 10 yards down field.  

Teddy by nature is a check down QB IMO. 

A reasonably healthy Cam is a better player though 

[MHS831]

2 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

Idk what's harder to believe, that the OP has an IQ over 50 or that this dribble drabble articulated post got pied 7 times. This website never ceases to amaze me

And to make it worse, some people create posts with nothing constructive at all to say and choose to attack others for contributing to a thread that is not interesting to the post creator. Isn't that odd?  In some cases, I understand that it may boost one's cyber self-image or help the poster deal with some daddy issues, based on the fact that the poster did not just skip the topic altogether and think "to each his own," something that most of us do.  So the position that the OP and all who like his contribution must obtain your approval in order to become legitimized is more of a statement about your distorted self image and the insecurity behind it than the sharing of some valued opinion presented as common sense.  So I ask you, did something here offend you, Socrates? 

[Captain Obvious]

it's May 2nd and we are still undefeated.   

[Mr Mojo Risin]

4 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

And to make it worse, some people create posts with nothing constructive at all to say and choose to attack others for contributing to a thread that is not interesting to the post creator. Isn't that odd?  In some cases, I understand that it may boost one's cyber self-image or help the poster deal with some daddy issues, based on the fact that the poster did not just skip the topic altogether and think "to each his own," something that most of us do.  So the position that the OP and all who like his contribution must obtain your approval in order to become legitimized is more of a statement about your distorted self image and the insecurity behind it than the sharing of some valued opinion presented as common sense.  So I ask you, did something here offend you, Socrates? 

Got your panties in a wad this early on a Saturday? That's not healthy bud

[MHS831]

1 minute ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

Got your panties in a wad this early on a Saturday? That's not healthy bud

Nah.  You don't have that effect on me or anyone, I can assume, which probably explains the pointless posts.  Calling people stupid is a dickish thing to do--it is not called for and I am fairly certain you have not cornered the market on intelligence.

 

[MHS831]

So don't troll the OP by calling him stupid and all who pied him and then talk about how bad this forum has become.   Duh.