I don't know if we're actually trading Samuel but...

[PantherPhann89]

But I do know that it most likely won't be to the Eagles because they just traded for Marquise Goodwin from the 49'ers. Currently, the Eagles will have DeSean Jackson, Alshon Jeffery , Goodwin and youngsters Reagor, Arcega-Whiteside and Deontay Burnett. I don't see room for Samuels on their roster. Unless things change, we'll trot out Robbie Anderson, Pharoh Cooper,  Keith Kirkwood,  DJ Moore, Curtis Samuel and about 5 others including Seth Roberts.

[RASTAN66]

What is the local press saying?

Is Mr. Samuel gone?

What say ye @RoaringRiot?

 

[CarolinaNCSU]

The Packers could make a lot of sense if Samuel does end up being gone.  GB told Rodgers they'd get him weapons, and instead got his replacement.  If they can spin their "plan" was to get a somewhat proven WR over a rookie maybe Rodgers won't pout all year. 

[BurnHurnBurn]

44 minutes ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

The Packers could make a lot of sense if Samuel does end up being gone.  GB told Rodgers they'd get him weapons, and instead got his replacement.  If they can spin their "plan" was to get a somewhat proven WR over a rookie maybe Rodgers won't pout all year. 

Tom Brady is the only QB that pitches more of a bitchfit when its not goin good.  Rodgers has gotten such a pass for his  douchebaggery.  Its the type of diva nonsense people say about Cam except Aaron really does that poo.  I hate double standards.

[PantherPhann89]

1 hour ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

The Packers could make a lot of sense if Samuel does end up being gone.  GB told Rodgers they'd get him weapons, and instead got his replacement.  If they can spin their "plan" was to get a somewhat proven WR over a rookie maybe Rodgers won't pout all year. 

Yes it actually would. They have Adams and Fun Fun....

[Gesualdo]

2 hours ago, BurnHurnBurn said:

Tom Brady is the only QB that pitches more of a bitchfit when its not goin good.  Rodgers has gotten such a pass for his  douchebaggery.  Its the type of diva nonsense people say about Cam except Aaron really does that poo.  I hate double standards.

As much as I hate Tom Brady, there's no way in hell he could ever match Aaron's pout power.

[Cpt slay a ho]

On the record I don’t trading him should be on the table unless it’s a 2nd or 3rd rd pick, but the packers have an abundance of dbs. A swap for Kevin king or josh Jackson with a pick involved wouldn’t surprise me 

[trucpfan]

10 hours ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

The Packers could make a lot of sense if Samuel does end up being gone.  GB told Rodgers they'd get him weapons, and instead got his replacement.  If they can spin their "plan" was to get a somewhat proven WR over a rookie maybe Rodgers won't pout all year. 

Why would the heck would we trade a key piece to our new offense. I’m not seeing it we didn’t in the draft we’re NOT depleting our offense this is Joe Brady’s first season I’m pretty sure he’s trying to start out with a bang. Think about a young Kyle Shannon or Sean M young offensive guru. He’s not getting rid of a dynamic playmaker who’s only knock is getting catchable passes. We didn’t even look at the offense in the draft because Brady probably said I can score 28 if you can get a few stops we’ll win. We have a electric playmaker in Samuels, best RB in the league. A true savage dog leader in yac in WR in DJ and a leader in yards per pass in RA. Who gets rid of key pieces with no replacement to start his nfl career. It doesn’t make sense we’ve beefed up our O in free agency. And then addressed our d in the draft. Now with good coaching we can win 10 games based off our opponents maybe less hopefully more but our offense was strong last year I’d expect a much stronger showing with TB. Our d was ass we should be average atleast on defense which plays out to be a pretty good team

[Wes21]

9 hours ago, BurnHurnBurn said:

Tom Brady is the only QB that pitches more of a bitchfit when its not goin good.  Rodgers has gotten such a pass for his  douchebaggery.  Its the type of diva nonsense people say about Cam except Aaron really does that poo.  I hate double standards.

Being a douchebag is what cost Rodgers being the #1 overall pick.

[Untouchable]

Reagor probably ended Samuel to the Eagles. Similar all around skillset.

[stbugs]

We didn’t draft a WR, Samuel isn’t going anywhere. The drop off behind him is huge. If you want 3 WRs on the field, Samuel is it. None of the other WRs is close in talent. Seth Roberts is 29 and hasn’t ever eclipsed 500 yards or 5 TDs. Cooper is a returner and has 243 yards and 1 TD as his best. Kirk wood has 13 career receptions. Every other WR is an UDFA. It’s laughable that people still think in Brady’s offense that we’d trade our only real WR3. Samuel is so much more talented than everyone except Moore and probably on the same level as Anderson. He’s not going anywhere if the staff thinks we can compete. Also, the rest of the WRs is why I think Bayless has a great shot of making the team if he’s decent. 

[PantherPhann89]

5 hours ago, trucpfan said:

Why would the heck would we trade a key piece to our new offense. I’m not seeing it we didn’t in the draft we’re NOT depleting our offense this is Joe Brady’s first season I’m pretty sure he’s trying to start out with a bang. Think about a young Kyle Shannon or Sean M young offensive guru. He’s not getting rid of a dynamic playmaker who’s only knock is getting catchable passes. We didn’t even look at the offense in the draft because Brady probably said I can score 28 if you can get a few stops we’ll win. We have a electric playmaker in Samuels, best RB in the league. A true savage dog leader in yac in WR in DJ and a leader in yards per pass in RA. Who gets rid of key pieces with no replacement to start his nfl career. It doesn’t make sense we’ve beefed up our O in free agency. And then addressed our d in the draft. Now with good coaching we can win 10 games based off our opponents maybe less hopefully more but our offense was strong last year I’d expect a much stronger showing with TB. Our d was ass we should be average atleast on defense which plays out to be a pretty good team

I agree wholeheartedly, but Samuel was rumored to be in trade talks entering the draft. 

[Soul Rebel]

Now that the draft is over, the front office talk needs to be on re-signing him in advance of 2021 offseason, not trading him. He's only 23 and was sorely underutilized under the RR regime. Brady will use him properly and I can see a lot of motion with confusing defenses w/ Samuel and CMC out of the backfield. 

Samuel is about to blow up and we need to not be in another Bradberry situation this coming offseason. 

 

[LinvilleGorge]

If he was going to be traded, I think it would've happened during the draft... and after we drafted a WR. It just didn't work out that way.