Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Possible Starting Defense After Draft


jfra78

Recommended Posts

We are two vet FA CBS away from being decent. I think we all know we won’t be in the playoffs next season but I am extremely impressed with this draft and our ability to replenish a defensive unit that looked like it could be the worst of all time before Thursday. Next year watch out...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't count too much on anybody beyond possibly the first two picks being immediate starters. There'll be some transition time needed.

If we do have more rookie starters than that, then I wouldn't set my expectations too high for them...or our defense as a whole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whats not listed here is the depth, which is a big need too. 6th round draftee is the top backup at DT. Shocking is there is some decent safety depth.

CB is a blackhole, no comment. Herniay needs to sign or trade whatever to get at least 2 NFL CB on this team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I wouldn't count too much on anybody beyond possibly the first two picks being immediate starters. There'll be some transition time needed.

If we do have more rookie starters than that, then I wouldn't set my expectations too high for them...or our defense as a whole.

You know Rhule is going to throw them all on the field. It’s pretty clear he’s trying to build a unit as if it was a college unit that’s going to be together for 4 years. Aka Seattle during their legion of boom time or w/e it was called. 
 

Let’s be real. Without all these rookies starting we still can’t even field a defense at this point. Much less a good one. The reality is our defense is gonna get torched worse than last year either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It amuses me how Goff's name the last few years is often used to compare to subpar or underperforming QB's. Now on the surface I get it. But when you look at his numbers he's been the same QB all along. He's improved his completion % but even with the Rams he averaged 63.4. And that Super Bowl he played in they should have won honestly. If we can get a QB as good as Goff I'll be pretty damn pleased.
    • And it remains to be seen if Goff has that ability or not. Plenty of very good QB's like Goff were not able to get over those playoff humps. Matt Ryan, Kirk Cousins, etc. You can still be an upper tier QB and never get over that hurdle. McVay just thought(and hasn't been wrong yet) Goff was never going to be that guy.
    • You literally simply have to think logically for either of those guys. Smith is locked up on a deal for 2025, so we would have to trade for him or he gets cut. Neither of those scenarios are likely in the first place.  Wilson will be 37 in 2025. Why on earth would he have any interest in a situation that is far worse than he was given in Denver and wasn't able to win there? He's a guy that can drop into any ready to win franchise in the NFL and immediately elevate their chances of winning(provided they already have QB issues).  Frankly, that is either speculation that even David Newton should be embarrassed by or it shows how disconnected with reality some people in our organization are.   I do agree with him on getting a veteran QB, however. That's our best chance to keep developing our talent.
×
×
  • Create New...