Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another Report: Teams calling Panthers about Curtis Samuel


WarPanthers89

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

You really do not understand the difference between speculating and actual reporting?  Sweet Jesus I am out on that one.

 

You said 100% teams offered trades for cmac.  Where is that proof

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, theinstrumental said:

This article attributes zero interest to the Eagles front office. It relies only on the fact that Carolina may be "listening to offers" and the blogger is running with it to primarily talk about Moore. 

Other then what Jourdan says Hurmey told her..

What real statement have we've gotten about Curtis Samuel??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

LOL! Wild, baseless speculation for clicks = "rumors" now. This is getting truly entertaining. You don't ink a guy to the richest contract in his position's history if you had him on the trade market. Good grief, man.

What is the difference here?? What do you think you're doing now on the Curtis Samuel report??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

You really do not understand the difference between speculating and actual reporting?  Sweet Jesus I am out on that one.

 

You said 100% teams offered trades for cmac.  Where is that proof

Are you fuging kidding me ??

You ppl have been arguing for 4 pages now about the actual reporting...

 

wouldn't this be the "Actual Reporting" from the "Actual Panther Reporter"...

Is this the twilight zone??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Trying to explain to you how these things work, obviously to no avail. Igo is smarter than me. He just dipped out instead of arguing.

Which in most intelligent circles would be called "baseless speculation" right?? 

Unless you have facts?? To back up your opinion?? 

I'm sorry IGO is god and never speculated before and been wrong...

Hahahahaha..

200.gif.5098a5e51c1baaa7c2b818ff0a054bc8.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...