Trade back with Dolphins 18,39, 70?

[JARROD]

This was mine I just did. A little drop back in the 3rd gave 2 extra picks. Suck it

 

[CPF4LIFE]

I am not interested in traing back past 10 to be honest. We didnt suck that bad not to get a blue chip player. 

[JawnyBlaze]

Nah probably wouldn’t wanna drop that far

[JARROD]

Miami is crazy,...

just sign Cam,.. then draft yourself a team.

ive been playing simulators with them half the day and wow... it’s fun playing with 14 picks.

If they are trying this hard that means that Herbert. Tua and Love aren’t doing it for them anyway.

Sign Cam and draft yourself a team. They did some really good FA signings already and can put themselves in a relevant position immediately.

[shaqattaq]

2 hours ago, section543 said:

Would you do this deal so Miami could get a top QB and OT.

That would give us 18, 38, 39, 69, 70. That could give us a good nucleus for our future. I think there could be 5 starters in top 70 picks

I may be in the minority, but yes. We have a ton of holes, and there is still starters that can be grabbed at 39 and 70.

If they want it that bad though, try to get them to give up 18, 39, and next year's 2nd.

[saX man]

2 hours ago, Shocker said:

Traded back with Cleveland...

 

	10.	CeeDee Lamb WR  Oklahoma
	38.	Trevon Diggs CB  Alabama
	69.	Jordan Elliott DT  Missouri
	74.	Lloyd Cushenberry C  LSU
	113.	Rashard Lawrence DT  LSU
	148.	Troy Dye ILB  Oregon
	152.	Bryce Hall CB  UVA
	184.	Khalil Davis DT  Nebraska
	221.	Damien Lewis

l

Tantalizing

[mickeye76]

2 hours ago, RevJ said:

If you follow the draft value chart, it would be more like their 18, 58, and 70.

So, I would be a "yes" for the 18, 39, and 70 - believing the new regime can draft better volume quality than Marty alone.

Yep 39 too rich and no the value chart would not match. Funny people are still vetoing this.  If simmons and okuda are gone a trade down works. 

[MMA]

Better get a future 1st along with that to even have me consider it