Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: per Jourdan Rodrigue, there is a high likelihood Panthers attempt to trade back from #7


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Patriots have a lotta picks--and NO QB.  To get Love, and Herbert/Tua are gone by #6, they may make a leap of faith for Love.  I mean, some people will do anything for love. 

 

It's impossible to do a trade with Belichick and not feel cheated.

see, you're not the only one with puns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, mickeye76 said:

Thanks. The Jets are my other trade partner.  Not moving down as far. Same reason the phins may move up, to get that top tier left tackle.  They got number 68 or a combo of 79 and 120. Not as sweet a deal as the phins but we not moving down as far. But somebody gonna slip out the top 10 that can help us and were likely a target to begin with. Brown, kinlaw, jeudy, or whichever corner they like. 

What about something like this with Jets?  I am taking a guess here at value

Jets get...picks  7 and 38

Panthers get.....picks  11 and 79 and  Jamal Adams

Panthers would have  11, 69, 79, and Adams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

What about something like this with Jets?  I am taking a guess here at value

Jets get...picks  7 and 38

Panthers get.....picks  11 and 79 and  Jamal Adams

Panthers would have  11, 69, 79, and Adams

That values Jamal Adams as about equal to the 71st pick, so a high third rounder, per the Chase Stuart chart. I'd do it, but I think the Jets would have a tough time with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

What about something like this with Jets?  I am taking a guess here at value

Jets get...picks  7 and 38

Panthers get.....picks  11 and 79 and  Jamal Adams

Panthers would have  11, 69, 79, and Adams

Jets would laugh us off the phone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

What about something like this with Jets?  I am taking a guess here at value

Jets get...picks  7 and 38

Panthers get.....picks  11 and 79 and  Jamal Adams

Panthers would have  11, 69, 79, and Adams

We’d be lucky if they gave us Adams for pick 7 straight up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been doing depth charts for the past 15 or more years to see how the team looks overall. Every year I'm able to put bodies on the chart to fill out a full 53 man squad before the draft. This year is the first in which we don't even have enough bodies on the defensive side to fill out a full depth chart. So I wouldn't be surprised with a trade down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

It's impossible to do a trade with Belichick and not feel cheated.

see, you're not the only one with puns.

We got Moton for Ealy because we were able to trade up with the Pats into the 2nd. Maybe Moton would have been there 8 or so picks later but it cost us nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

What about something like this with Jets?  I am taking a guess here at value

Jets get...picks  7 and 38

Panthers get.....picks  11 and 79 and  Jamal Adams

Panthers would have  11, 69, 79, and Adams

This is interesting. I get the Jamal Adams deal but i doubt he wants to be involved in a rebuild. I also don't want to part with that 38.  If let's say jedric wills is there at 7 Jets and dolphins will be calling.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mickeye76 said:

This is interesting. I get the Jamal Adams deal but i doubt he wants to be involved in a rebuild. I also don't want to part with that 38.  If let's say jedric wills is there at 7 Jets and dolphins will be calling.  

I’m hoping Wills is our pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...