Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Poll - Panthers Trade Up to 23 - Who is the pick?


Shocker

Poll: Panthers Trade Up to 23 - Who is the pick?  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is the pick?

    • Denzel Mims - WR, Baylor
      8
    • Neville Gallimore - DT, Oklahoma
      3
    • Patrick Queen - LB, LSU
      15
    • Kenneth Murray - LB, Oklahoma
      3
    • Ross Blacklock - DT, TCU
      5
    • Jordan Love - QB, Utah State
      20
    • A.J. Terrell - CB, Clemson
      9
    • Trevon Diggs - CB, Alabama
      8
    • A.J. Epenesa - DL, Iowa
      9
    • Other - explain
      1


Recommended Posts

What a Crappy move.

 

This is a deep CB class, and we still need a DT because our Inteior DL just may be the leagues worst.

 

Instead of getting 2 solid guys/2 potential starters.  We've moved up to trade for a guy who may be around if we stayed pat.  Its like dejavu all over again with Greg Little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ncfan said:

What a Crappy move.

 

This is a deep CB class, and we still need a DT because our Inteior DL just may be the leagues worst.

 

Instead of getting 2 solid guys/2 potential starters.  We've moved up to trade for a guy who may be around if we stayed pat.  Its like dejavu all over again with Greg Little.

Says the guy 3 hours late to pick...we spiced up the Mock Draft...

the big lebowski whatever GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shocker said:

Says the guy 3 hours late to pick...we spiced up the Mock Draft...

the big lebowski whatever GIF

Meh, cant stay glued to the huddle 247.

Took about 12 hours to go through 6 picks.  I step away for 5 hours and they burn through 7 picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...