Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Draft: Tristan Wirfs

Shocker

By Shocker,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted

My only problem with Wirfs is he gets sloppy with his technique.   This has been pointed out in a few videos on YouTube.   My thoughts are Wirfs is inconsistent with technique on his natural right side and teams are projecting him to the left side, how successful would a switch be?

It seems like downgrading him, but he would be stupid-good as a guard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

My only problem with Wirfs is he gets sloppy with his technique.   This has been pointed out in a few videos on YouTube.   My thoughts are Wirfs is inconsistent with technique on his natural right side and teams are projecting him to the left side, how successful would a switch be?

It seems like downgrading him, but he would be stupid-good as a guard.

WTF how is he sloppy?  Different tape from mine

Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Shocker said:

WTF how is he sloppy?  Different tape from mine

Footwork.  His slide-step is erratic at times as well as his mirror technique. He can get his base too narrow which a smart DE can get him off balance.  As far as mirroring, he tends to turn his body outward prematurely and sets the DE up for an inside move.

From the waist up he's a beast . That's the reason he would simply dominate as a guard.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Footwork.  His slide-step is erratic at times as well as his mirror technique. He can get his base too narrow which a smart DE can get him off balance.  As far as mirroring, he tends to turn his body outward prematurely and sets the DE up for an inside move.

From the waist up he's a beast.  That's the reason he would simply dominate as a guard.  He

Like every comment you did is wrong 

His footwork is awesome

His combine was second to none 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jessicasmith0
      Does JetBlue have free cancellation?

      By jessicasmith0 · Posted

      https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • tukafan21
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • Carolina Mike
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...