Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you do this deal?


Actionman0z

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, theinstrumental said:

In a heartbeat. A first, second, and two thirds? That's good return for a top player in the league, and we don't even know what the guy we'd take at 7 is going to be yet.

A huge part of the value of a draft pick is the cheap contract. The best way to get elite talent for minimal cap impact is a high draft pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

You don't, "we" as in the people who make those decisions do, and have prepared for almost every possible scenario that could/would happen in front of us.

Well, the Panthers may not be doing that as we have a fool at the helm, but most teams are.

There's plenty of literature that shows that GMs have historically overvalued their ability to make the right choice even at the top of the draft, starting with the Thaler/Massey study here: https://www.nber.org/papers/w11270. That's been incorporated into the Chase Stuart draft value chart which assigns much lower values to the very highest picks. By that chart, we're getting a 177% return in this trade. 7 is closer to 15 than we traditionally think, so the extra second and two thirds is a big win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, theinstrumental said:

There's plenty of literature that shows that GMs have historically overvalued their ability to make the right choice even at the top of the draft, starting with the Thaler/Massey study here: https://www.nber.org/papers/w11270. That's been incorporated into the Chase Stuart draft value chart which assigns much lower values to the very highest picks. By that chart, we're getting a 177% return in this trade. 7 is closer to 15 than we traditionally think, so the extra second and two thirds is a big win.

Do with it what you may, the question was asked and answered.

I wouldn't take the deal, make another team come up with more for Tua or Herbert or whomever they would be trading up for, hopefully a QB.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

A huge part of the value of a draft pick is the cheap contract. The best way to get elite talent for minimal cap impact is a high draft pick.

Totally agreed. That's why I'd jump at three more bites at the apple. 15's still a really good pick, and considering the number of holes on our roster, the extra second and two thirds are probably our best shot at fielding a competitive defense. Brown would help our run defense, but so would building depth along the line, and the extra picks let us do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, theinstrumental said:

Totally agreed. That's why I'd jump at three more bites at the apple. 15's still a really good pick, and considering the number of holes on our roster, the extra second and two thirds are probably our best shot at fielding a competitive defense. Brown would help our run defense, but so would building depth along the line, and the extra picks let us do that.

No, I definitely get where you're coming from. There's certainly an argument to be made for piling up picks, especially when you have a ton of holes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No, I definitely get where you're coming from. There's certainly an argument to be made for piling up picks, especially when you have a ton of holes.

If we were rebuilding, I would have taken the trade offer, but with a different player attached, but we aren't, so here we sit.  We are just shooting for below average at this point, which should make most Panther fans feel right at home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...