Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Burrow


Shocker

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think Cam was lucky. I think we were lucky. We subjected Cam to an unholy pounding playing behind a shoddy OL year in and year out while Shula dialed up slow developing downfield routes with no checkdowns because the checkdowns were trying to help out the aforementioned shoddy OL. And oh yeah, you're also our primary running option too.

I wish I could have seen cam with a consistent top 10 oline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I wish I could have seen cam with a consistent top 10 oline

The one year he had one he was the MVP and we went to the Super Bowl. Mike Shula only having one counter to the blitz cost us that Super Bowl. Wade Phillips played him like a fiddle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Shocker said:

Please watch his 19 tape...it is completely ridiculous 

Every throw is perfect or near

Go watch his 18 tape. 

He is an elite game manager. He will need to be in the right system to be successful. He is going to Cincy, so don't be shocked if he is a bust while he is there. Doesn't mean he will be a failure as a player. Drew Brees was a very underwhelming NFL QB until he hooked up with Sean Payton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Go watch his 18 tape. 

He is an elite game manager. He will need to be in the right system to be successful. He is going to Cincy, so don't be shocked if he is a bust while he is there. Doesn't mean he will be a failure as a player. Drew Brees was a very underwhelming NFL QB until he hooked up with Sean Payton.

So we are just ignoring full seasons now?  lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Shocker said:

So we are just ignoring full seasons now?  lol

I mean, you can continue thinking he is the greatest QB in a generation. Just don't be surprised when he isn't. I am not saying anything outlandish. It's pretty much the consensus on him. He's the #1 QB in this class but he does have a limited ceiling. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Physically speaking, he isn't Cam Newton but I wouldn't say he necessarily has a limited ceiling. Of all the positions, the intangibles matter the most at QB by far. I mean, the greatest QB of the modern era is a former 6th round draft pick who was a complete afterthought coming into the draft.  

I've talked about Mahomes a lot here, but do we really know what he'd look like in the NFL outside of Andy Reid's system? Andy Reid makes every QB he plays look legit. Mahomes himself admitted he was clueless on reading defenses coming into the NFL. Would he have been a bust without Reid? Who knows? No way of telling. It's just a complicated ass picture trying to project prospects to the next level. Way too many variables and moving parts to ever come close to accounting for all of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Physically speaking, he isn't Cam Newton but I wouldn't say he necessarily has a limited ceiling. Of all the positions, the intangibles matter the most at QB by far. I mean, the greatest QB of the modern era is a former 6th round draft pick who was a complete afterthought coming into the draft.  

I've talked about Mahomes a lot here, but do we really know what he'd look like in the NFL outside of Andy Reid's system? Andy Reid makes every QB he plays look legit. Mahomes himself admitted he was clueless on reading defenses coming into the NFL. Would he have been a bust without Reid? Who knows? No way of telling. It's just a complicated ass picture trying to project prospects to the next level. Way too many variables and moving parts to ever come close to accounting for all of them.

Burrow's limitations are largely physical. He doesn't have great arm strength and he isn't a great athlete. His intangibles seem pretty high, so that may outweigh his physical limitations. 

Like I said, don't be surprised if he really struggles in Cincy because they are a shitty franchise and don't tailor their offense to make him as successful as he was playing under Joe Brady. I mean, he went from a pretty pedestrian college career to one of the best seasons in the history of college football. Is it more likely that something "clicked" for him or that Sean Payton's offense was perfect for his skill set?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question - if he was a product of the system, and we just hired the OC of that system, wouldn't that be a win, win for us? And the style offense LSU ran under Burrow/Brady should translate to NFL, right? Of course success at college level does not guarantee same success at NFL level, but you gotta think the chips are stacked especially for us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthers4real said:

Question - if he was a product of the system, and we just hired the OC of that system, wouldn't that be a win, win for us? And the style offense LSU ran under Burrow/Brady should translate to NFL, right? Of course success at college level does not guarantee same success at NFL level, but you gotta think the chips are stacked especially for us?

Yes, he would be much more valuable for either us or New Orleans, given that he was so successful in that system already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be more than happy when he is off the board when we pick. The more I look at him the more I don't think he is worth a top pick. I remember when Alex Smith went to the 49ers and laughed. Good QB? Sure. A guy that would make you not pass up a stud when you aren't staring at a depleted roster? Just ask Mahomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...