Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Javon Kinlaw Discussion


Shocker

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm both intrigued and scared. I think he's boom or bust and I have no idea which one it's gonna be.

Feels like he is being overlooked slightly as the top DT.  He is hungry and really talented.  Love his makeup.  He lived in the GA backfield against a great OL.  Love the way he played against the best in the SEC.

His interview on Van Pelt show was cool.  He is laid back but still seemed all biz.  Love this guys simple hard working mentality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me this is about the closest the top two players (at a position) can be to one another. I think Kinlaw would be a better fit in a 3-4 over brown as a end. Plus has the better "upside" to brown. That said brown seems to be the better 2020 draftee. Kinlaw has great tape, Browns is better, jesus that LSU is unreal.  Brown is younger too 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Kinlaw.. But ppl there is a reason why he isn't better then Brown...

 

The Bama games was solid but you see some ..

Lacking motor traits

One pass rush move and done..

Technical flaws  like Turing to much and giving up his back to Olinemen..

And he doesn't demand double teams like Brown does...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Feels like he is being overlooked slightly as the top DT.  He is hungry and really talented.  Love his makeup.  He lived in the GA backfield against a great OL.  Love the way he played against the best in the SEC.

His interview on Van Pelt show was cool.  He is laid back but still seemed all biz.  Love this guys simple hard working mentality.

 

What game are you talking about?? Honestly 

He got bullied and pushed around alot in this game.. He even got pancaked atleast 3 or 4 times in this game..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I like Kinlaw.. But ppl there is a reason why he isn't better then Brown...

 

The Bama games was solid but you see some ..

Lacking motor traits

One pass rush move and done..

Technical flaws  like Turing to much and giving up his back to Olinemen..

And he doesn't demand double teams like Brown does...

Space eater or pass rush?  I agree its a decent question.  Brown is not the Bear you think all the time...he was also surrounded by talent on defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I personally think this cat is a better pass rusher than Brown.  Nasty demeanor and the measurements check out.

Thoughts on him at 7?  Feels really possible if not probable.

 

I have seen some boards with him higher than Brown.  I like Brown---can play all positions and is solid in all aspects of the game--but these 2 are 1a and 1b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I think Brown has a higher floor and Kinlaw has a higher ceiling. Personally, I'd take Brown at #7 but Kinlaw if we traded down. 

Interesting statement---well said and it makes perfect sense for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...