Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL Draft Opinion - Best Player Poll


Shocker

NFL Draft - Best player  

64 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is the best football player regardless of need?

    • Derrick Brown
      9
    • Jeff Okudah
      21
    • Isaiah Simmons
      23
    • Jedrick Wills
      0
    • Jerry Jeudy
      4
    • Other
      7


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, bababoey said:

Really, no Chase Young.  In this draft it's Chase Young followed by Simmons and then everyone else.  If you want best player it's Young and I don't think it's really close.

Guess you can’t read...we don't have a realistic chance at Young

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, bababoey said:

Title of the poll says Best player regardless of need.  Says nothing about realistic chance.  I guess you can't write.

lol

Poll...who is the best football player regardless of need who is a realistic pick at 7?

Could not be more clear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bababoey said:

Really, no Chase Young.  In this draft it's Chase Young followed by Simmons and then everyone else.  If you want best player it's Young and I don't think it's really close.

It would’ve been a toss up between Young and Tua if he was completely healthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Shocker said:

lol

Poll...who is the best football player regardless of need who is a realistic pick at 7?

Could not be more clear

Quote

1. Who is the best football player regardless of need?

You're not that bright are you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see a legit argument for about 8 players. Seriously. Young, Simmons, Okudah, Burrow, Wills, Jeudy, Brown, Tua. I could see someone making a very legit argument for any of those prospects being the best player available in the draft. It's a very good year to be sitting at #7 overall. We're guaranteed a blue chip prospect. It may or may not be a blue chip prospect at the position that we want, but we just need to play "draft the stud" this year. There's gonna be one there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I can see a legit argument for about 8 players. Seriously. Young, Simmons, Okudah, Burrow, Wills, Jeudy, Brown, Tua. I could see someone making a very legit argument for any of those prospects being the best player available in the draft. It's a very good year to be sitting at #7 overall. We're guaranteed a blue chip prospect. It may or may not be a blue chip prospect at the position that we want, but we just need to play "draft the stud" this year. There's gonna be one there.

Could see us also taking Herbert if he is there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/7/2020 at 12:03 PM, saX man said:

Unpopular opinion: I think Jeudy is the 3rd/4th best WR in the draft. 

Really? 

I think he's the best route runner I've ever seen in college. That ish will translate better than speed, great hands, or leaping ability. An extra step of separation will get you more targets than anything else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...