Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers discussed trading up to #1 for Joe Burrow


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Growl said:

let's say a pantherclaw alt created a long winded blathering incoherent response which invalidated his own self admitted feelies-first stance once he realized he couldn't dispute a stated point directed at him

 

except this time, it isn't mythical nor incomprehensible, its happening, right here and now

burn that idiot, goddamn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Growl said:

oh wow, whatever his name is, well nevermind what I said, you clearly understand our roster/staff composition better than I, disregard the math, you're right were gonna go 0-16

 

where is your dad

Hmmm we don’t have a roster. We have Hurney as GM still. Rhule NEVER has done good in his first year and has ZERO NFL experience. Snow was on the 2008 lions.

But you want to quote math?
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Hmmm we don’t have a roster. We have Hurney as GM still. Rhule NEVER has done good in his first year and has ZERO NFL experience. Snow was on the 2008 lions.

But you want to quote math?
 

okay so let's go on record then, you're predicting the team goes 0-16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, kass said:

Where I come from, "Fans" and "reasonably" are incompatible "words" and cannot be used together in the same sentence and my time on this board has proven to me that it is the same in the US.

You're not from Growlerville.

Growlervillian's are thoughtful, reasonable, and not blinded by illusions from the past. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sooooooooo........they are looking at QB.

Trading up to #1 is almost always a mistake, would not do. Much too costly.

Trading up to #3,#4 would be a better risk vs reward proposition. They wouldn't bag Burrow of course but Herbert or Tua could be a great get for a team that needs a future at QB.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...