Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL.com's fascinatingly great 4-round mock draft


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

Trading up to take James Lynch in the 1st... good grief. I don't want him with one of our top 3 picks, much less in the 1st. He's a mid-late round draft pick IMO. Quarterman is another guy who fits that "great college player who probably won't translate well" mold.

If we come out of the the first four rounds having traded our 3rd and 5th to come away with Okudah, Lynch, and Quarterman then we've failed miserably. But, it's a typical Hurney draft. Nail the first pick, then... oh wee mayne.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Trading up to take James Lynch in the 1st... good grief. I don't want him with one of our top 3 picks, much less in the 1st. He's a mid-late round draft pick IMO. Quarterman is another guy who fits that "great college player who probably won't translate well" mold.

If we come out of the the first four rounds having traded our 3rd and 5th to come away with Okudah, Lynch, and Quarterman then we've failed miserably. But, it's a typical Hurney draft. Nail the first pick, then... oh wee mayne.

yeah, apparently Chad Reuter thinks we're retards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Trading up to take James Lynch in the 1st... good grief. I don't want him with one of our top 3 picks, much less in the 1st. He's a mid-late round draft pick IMO. Quarterman is another guy who fits that "great college player who probably won't translate well" mold.

If we come out of the the first four rounds having traded our 3rd and 5th to come away with Okudah, Lynch, and Quarterman then we've failed miserably. But, it's a typical Hurney draft. Nail the first pick, then... oh wee mayne.

Chances are we will reach for one his former players, that's to be expected, but lets not reach that far.  If he is there in the third then maybe.

I could see us looking at him though, can he play strong side end on rushing downs? and maybe kick inside on passing downs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 4 round Panther draft

1st Brown DT Auburn

2nd Noah Igbinoghene CB Auburn

3rd Willie Gay LB Mississippi State 

3rd by trade Biadasz C Wisconsin 

Fits needs and upgrade each position. Biadasz can also play G until he moves over the next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see #38 being Lynch.  Wouldn't want it but Rhule and Snow are that big of fans of him. 

I could swallow a late 2nd trade up or our 3rd at the very most.  38 needs to be a day 1 impact.  The top-50 talent in this draft is too damn good to get James Lynch that early as solid as he may be as a long term rotational lineman.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, saX man said:

I can see #38 being Lynch.  Wouldn't want it but Rhule and Snow are that big of fans of him. 

I could swallow a late 2nd trade up or our 3rd at the very most.  38 needs to be a day 1 impact.  The top-50 talent in this draft is too damn good to get James Lynch that early as solid as he may be as a long term rotational lineman.   

I believe they likely think that he IS a day one impact player at a position of dire need. Well, hell... what position outside of RB ISN'T a dire need for us?

If they take him way earlier than they probably should, I just hope they turn out to be right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I believe they likely think that he IS a day one impact player at a position of dire need. Well, hell... what position outside of RB ISN'T a dire need for us?

If they take him way earlier than they probably should, I just hope they turn out to be right.

On the positive side, Lynch is quite a solid player.  I don't know if I see a star or anything but he has some fun reels.  THe talent likely available at 38 is going to be LEGIT though.  Lynch shouldn't be in consideration there.  Maybe a trade up around pick 55-ish. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not about what you did in college, it's about whether or not that translates to the NFL. I have major concerns when a guy is both undersized for his position AND didn't test all that well athletically. I mean, Michael Sam was a great college player too but he was undersized and didn't test well athletically.

Some guys just don't have the necessary talent to carry over their success to the next level of competition. I'm concerned Lynch is one of those guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by V   https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24byhttps://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24byhttps://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by
    • It's been a tradition of mine in FF I ignore the name of the RB and draft them based on the oline. For years, Dallas was the elite line. Now it's Philly. It's been plug and play behind those lines. Investing those day 2 picks on the interior line allows you to take a day 3 RB and get day 2 results. 
    • So we have Tremble, JT Sanders, and the Thomas - Franks is the 4th but mainly just for Special teams.  Sanders is a TE - on paper, on the roster, physically, and on the field.  If you are trying to claim because he is a good receiver and not a great blocker he is not a TE then you have not watched very much football, like at all.  Cause that is how a ton of TE's come into the league.  Literally the #1, most common area for improvement for the TE group every single year - especially the top 5 TE's. And for the 1 millionth time, for the people in the back - drafting BPA is absolutely not a rule that anyone follows.  Not a single team.  They always factor in multiple things, BPA being one of them but not the most important almost ever.  It is an evaluation of need, personal evaluation, pick position/who drafts before your next pick, trade offers, free agents possible.  They don't follow it for good reason. Perfect example - Bo Nix.  He was not rated anywhere near #12 by just about anyone - including the broncos.  But they drafted him because they NEEDED a QB, liked him, and had no 2nd RD pick.  They outright said that.  Do you think they regret the pick?  They drafted 100% for need and pick position. Example #2 - Bijan.  Atlanta drafted BPA.  He is amazing, had a great 2 years so far.  They were 7-10 for 2 straight years prior.  And the 2 years after they have been 7-10 & 8-9.  Do you think they made the right decision?  By the way they also spent the #4 overall pick on Pitts, a Generational TE, and he/they suck.  I'd imagine Falcon fans would not agree with your BPA theory since they missed out on Chase, Waddle, Parsons, Horn, PSII, DeVonta Smith - all positions of need in 2021. BPA is A criteria, but not THE criteria.
×
×
  • Create New...