Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you not see the advantage we have in Rhule...


musicman

Recommended Posts

He was in the college ranks and probably knows more players and has deeper knowledge of them from either trying to recruit them, working with them or playing against them, than any current NFL coach. Brady and Snow and a few of his other coaches too just add to it. With the disadvantage all teams are under right now with the restrictions, we have in what I believe to be a big advantage to draft better "football" guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it is a big advantage in the draft.

Pete Carol said this was his advantage when he took over the Seahawks and is why they had those early ‘miracle drafts’.

Of course, that advantage faded after a few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a fun sales pitch. Unfortunately he now has to deal with salaries, players that age out, guys with families that are no longer young adults and a level of competition unseen in the level where he was very good.

This staff needs to learn new ropes. I'm  fine with that but they need time to adjust to the changes. Just because he was in college last year doesn't equate to him being a better talent acquirer. Does he know how to work with scouts and how to interpret their information?

Sorry but your take is all optimism backed by the premise that he was in college so he knows more. Did he watch every game? Are recruits to college the same player when they graduate? Seems like a rather large jump in your conclusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Waldo said:

That's a fun sales pitch. Unfortunately he now has to deal with salaries, players that age out, guys with families that are no longer young adults and a level of competition unseen in the level where he was very good.

This staff needs to learn new ropes. I'm  fine with that but they need time to adjust to the changes. Just because he was in college last year doesn't equate to him being a better talent acquirer. Does he know how to work with scouts and how to interpret their information?

Sorry but your take is all optimism backed by the premise that he was in college so he knows more. Did he watch every game? Are recruits to college the same player when they graduate? Seems like a rather large jump in your conclusion.

You missed the whole thing. Is it not a fact that he probably has more "closer" knowledge of college players than other teams and coaches because he played against, recruited or scouted them just a few  months ago?

I say a clear yes. That's all what I wrote. What he does with it, adjusting salaries had nothing to do with the negative crap you added. No offense, but when you're that negative about a "single positive statement", you probably have a bad outlook on everything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, musicman said:

You missed the whole thing. Is it not a fact that he probably has more "closer" knowledge of college players than other teams and coaches because he played against, recruited or scouted them just a few  months ago?

I say a clear yes. That's all what I wrote. What he does with it, adjusting salaries had nothing to do with the negative crap you added. No offense, but when you're that negative about a "single positive statement", you probably have a bad outlook on everything. 

Some of them yes. All of them? I suspect not. There is a trend that new NFL from college go with what they know but that could be a mixed bag on who they played and where they coached. I just think you are overblowing it. He knows some players but does he know how to build a winning NFL team?

Stop focusing on positivity and negativity and look at it logically. There is some truth in you angle but it's an piece of the pie not the pie itself. Back away from the coolaide and try some water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Waldo said:

Some of them yes. All of them? I suspect not. There is a trend that new NFL from college go with what they know but that could be a mixed bag on who they played and where they coached. I just think you are overblowing it. He knows some players but does he know how to build a winning NFL team?

Stop focusing on positivity and negativity and look at it logically. There is some truth in you angle but it's an piece of the pie not the pie itself. Back away from the coolaide and try some water.

But that's just it. I was only looking "logically and accurately" at a slice of the pie, not the whole pie. You're being a right fighter to prove your point but you over shot the post. I was only talking one thing, not about winning or having a winning season. It's like moving from another city that people know a lot about, but never lived there, but you did. You will know more about that city than others because you just came from there. Just that he probably had better insight into young guys about to be drafted than other coaches and teams. It's just that simple. And cool aide is made with water so I'm getting my H2O ;). In all seriousness, be safe out there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, every now and then, it's okay to look at something that's positive in a vacuum and just concede "hey that's probably true, fair enough".  I doubt OP is condoning having a party about it or anything, but his statement is probably true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, musicman said:

He was in the college ranks and probably knows more players and has deeper knowledge of them from either trying to recruit them, working with them or playing against them, than any current NFL coach. Brady and Snow and a few of his other coaches too just add to it. With the disadvantage all teams are under right now with the restrictions, we have in what I believe to be a big advantage to draft better "football" guys. 

I hope this helps us rebuild our core group of guys over the next few years!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tbe said:

Yeah, it is a big advantage in the draft.

Pete Carol said this was his advantage when he took over the Seahawks and is why they had those early ‘miracle drafts’.

Of course, that advantage faded after a few years.

Pete was definitely the mastermind behind those early drafts, no doubt.  But where the situation might be different is that Pete had such a long history in the NFL before going to college.  He could almost be looked at as an NFL coach who spent some time in college, rather than a college coach who spent some time in the NFL.  Rhule has spent so little time in the NFL that he's not going to have the same grasp of what translates to the NFL game like Pete had.

I still remember the story Pat Kirwan tells of when Pete called him about a recruit he was super excited about.  Pete said "Pat, keep an eye out for the Earl Thomas kid I just lost to Texas.  I think he's the next Troy Polamalu!"  Years later when Pete had a choice between his own USC safety and Earl, we know who he chose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having an understanding of the man (Rhule),  and I think it's fairly simple the man is very detailed oriented.  

Most on here are more willing to claim he'll fail before anything happens, instead of sitting back and enjoying the ride. 

I'm pretty excited. Hard to understand why so many aren't.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • i think i go in the opposite direction of most. my ideal retirement is living in some old downtown area in a flat above some shop or something.  life out in the country was just something i got real tired of. My kids actually miss some of living out there, which i understand. that was where they grew up for the most part. 40 acres with a 2.5 acre pond. it was beautiful, but also way too much (and too expensive) for me to keep up with. 
    • FLASHBACK: I remember back when ESPN was just starting--he was their anchor.  They used to show stuff like Rodeo and field hockey--I remember laughing when he went to a commercial mocking a cycling competition in Utah (or something similar--I made that up) and I laughed.  I told my dad, "We may have us a new anchor when we get back from commercial."  When they came back from commercial, Berman was looking very serious and he said, "Any comments by me do not reflect the views of ESPN....The men and women who cycle are dedicated athletes and we are honored to shine light on their sport." (Paraphrasing).  Dad laughed hysterically. My first memory of him--and that was like 1980.
    • Might not have a team without them. Although that probably applies to the Panthers, too.
×
×
  • Create New...