Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bridgewater contract vs. 1st round qb


Actionman0z

Recommended Posts

PICK

TEAM

PLAYER

TOTAL CONTRACT

SIGNING BONUS

1

Cardinals

 Kyler Murray  $35.2 million  $23.6 million

2

49ers

 Nick Bosa  $33.6 million  $22.4 million

3

Jets

 Quinnen Williams  $32.6 million  $21.5 million

4

Raiders

 Clelin Ferrell  $31.4 million  $20.6 million

5

Buccaneers

 Devin White  $29.3 million  $19.1 million

6

Giants

 Daniel Jones  $25.7 million  $16.6 million

7

Jaguars

 Josh Allen  $22.8 million  $14.6 million

8

Lions

 T.J. Hockenson  $19.9 million  $12.7 million

9

Bills

 Ed Oliver  $19.7 million  $12.5 million

10

Steelers

 Devin Bush  $18.9 million  $11.9 million

 

Rookie contracts are pretty much based on draft position and not playing position

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Actionman0z said:

I meant, with the what TB5 is structured, does it make sense to draft one at 7 this year, or is QB now off the table?

It doesn’t matter. A QB at 7 gets paid like a backup QB for 4 years. Even top 5 picks next year don’t make enough to be bad cap hits. The only impact on selecting a QB is liking a guy enough. I just hope we don’t waste pick 7 on Herbert. The QBs next year are way better and pick 7 should be a bonafide stud just based on the number of studs and QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bridgewater's deal allows us to draft elsewhere and look at it again next year when we are drafting in the top 10 again. Very possibly the year after also. His deal is during the time of least competitiveness so it really doesn't matter and I don't see how throwing a rookie out there helps much, example David Carr. If we still don't have a decent LT next year then we would have a ways to go. The coaches need to step up and coach these players up and the ones that can't need to be gone regardless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

We can easily afford a QB at #7 but the question is more whether we are looking in that direction. I think with the Bridgewater and PJ Walker signings, I would say we are done at QB for this offseason, unless something crazy happens like a Tua free fall. 

One thing few talked about when we signed TB was that it bought us time.  Before the signing, we had a starting QB under contract for one year, whose health/durability we had questions about.  IMO, that would have elevated the QB position in priority, either by draft or FA.  Even extending Cam would not have resolved that until well into the season, if he could stay on the field.  Now we have him (at least for the time being) and another starter who is signed on a manageable deal for three years.  That pushed the priority of the QB position back, even if/when we release/trade Cam.

Given our list of needs is almost as long as the list of positions on a football field, there is no rush and puts us in a position to be patient for a while and wait for "our guy" to be available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sgt Schultz said:

One thing few talked about when we signed TB was that it bought us time.  Before the signing, we had a starting QB under contract for one year, whose health/durability we had questions about.  IMO, that would have elevated the QB position in priority, either by draft or FA.  Even extending Cam would not have resolved that until well into the season, if he could stay on the field.  Now we have him (at least for the time being) and another starter who is signed on a manageable deal for three years.  That pushed the priority of the QB position back, even if/when we release/trade Cam.

Given our list of needs is almost as long as the list of positions on a football field, there is no rush and puts us in a position to be patient for a while and wait for "our guy" to be available.

I am curious to see how/if they plan to build a team here. Right now we are basically not committed to almost anyone on the roster outside of Shaq. Our "core" players is an extremely small group that could get a lot smaller after this coming season. So are we going to try and build a team AFTER we get our QB??? If so.....that's pretty ass backwards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I am curious to see how/if they plan to build a team here. Right now we are basically not committed to almost anyone on the roster outside of Shaq. Our "core" players is an extremely small group that could get a lot smaller after this coming season. So are we going to try and build a team AFTER we get our QB??? If so.....that's pretty ass backwards. 

Gawd I hope not, unless somebody falls to us this year or next that walks on water.  Then again, people thought the Golden Calf walked on water.  Some though Manziel walked on water.

This draft is going to tell me a lot about our rebuilding plan.  And let's just say any potential personnel move in the front office after the draft will speak as loudly as the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is why it's probably going to be hard to trade down. This draft is fairly light on top tier talent but pretty deep in talent of that next tier down. I don't think there's going to be a lot of teams clamoring to move up and numerous teams might be entertaining moving down. Not a good market to trade down if that's the case. 
    • And if they can't find a reasonable trade down (I think we would need a 2nd rounder this year bare minimum to make any trade down worth it). I would definitely expect Dan to trade UP for an EDGE or LB in the top half of R2. Just makes too much sense. We also have a plethora of mid round picks to use as ammo. 
    • I don't mean to make this a mock draft thread particularly,  but every time I do a mock I have been investigating the talent that goes off the board between picks 8 and our low 2nd rounder pick 57. There is a gargantuan amount of talent still left on the board in the top half of the 2nd round every time I do one. Losing our original 2nd round pick to the Bears as the last pick of the Bryce trade stings badly .  I'm particularly looking at elite players like Carson Schwesinger (LB), Luther Burden (WR), Matthew Golden (WR), Maxwell Hairston (CB) , Nick Scourton , Landon Jackson, Donavan Ezeraku (all DEs/OLBs) . The sweet spot in this draft really feels like pick 15 to 40 - ish. This is why the Bears should be making bank with this draft. I don't know how realistic a trade down is from 8, but if we could pick up any teams higher 2nd rounder and still grab their 1st? We'd be cooking with gas man.  Say for example we get Tet McMillan at pick 8, if you wait all the way to 57 you stand the chance of not getting any impact pass rushers in this draft. And I don't think this team can afford that.  I'd personally love for them to take a break from drafting wrs in R1 or R2 (i think we've taken one in the top 2 rounds in the majority of the past few years), and stick to repairing the nfls worse defense in history (in terms of total points against iirc, or was it yards? Also included my most recent mock as an example . Don't put too much into the  late round selections lol  
×
×
  • Create New...