What numbers does Bridgewater have to produce for us not to draft a QB next year??

[WOW!!]

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If you don't have a franchise QB and you're in the position to draft a prospect you think is a franchise QB, you take the QB. Period. You don't let a veteran bandaid keep you from drafting a franchise QB prospect.

Your 1st post.. Did you answer the question here?? Or state your opinion about a subject that had nothing to do with the original question on the 1st place??

[WOW!!]

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Obviously if he puts up Mahomes numbers then he's a franchise QB and if he does that, then we're likely not in draft position to land a franchise QB prospect.

Meanwhile, that seems about as likely to me as me discovering the cure to the coronavirus in my garage this evening.

2nd post.. You reply to my sarcastic question to another  poster?? Still really haven't answered the original question..

[LinvilleGorge]

23 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

You're the one acting like if someone doesnt answer your question exactly how you want then they dont deserve to write on your thread.  Kinda childish really.  

QFT

[WOW!!]

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If your QB puts up Mahomes numbers, you're winning a lot of games. QBs don't put up MVP type numbers on bad teams.

3rd post.. Still haven't answered the original question.. And now you're head strong into a sarcastic comment..

[WOW!!]

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

All stats aren't created equal too. If TB has good stats but most of them come in garbage time while we're getting blown out against prevent defenses then that's a lot different than putting up good stats in competitive games.

4th post.. Still haven't answered the original question.. But atleast you've added a valid Cavet that might lead you to answering the original question... good job..

 

 

[LinvilleGorge]

No one can answer your question in the fashion that you want it answered because it's a completely idiotic premise. There is no concrete stat line in which Teddy Bridgewater is definitely our crowned franchise QB. Football is a lot more complicated than that. I'm sorry you don't have the self awareness to realize why you've been so thoroughly mocked in this thread.

[WOW!!]

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't think there's a hard line in the sand.  I think it's more about what our overall offense looks like with him running it.

 

Your 5th post was a gif dedicated to a moron troll..

But your 6th  post is you setting standards for you finally answering the question.. So we're almost there yeah!!!

[LinvilleGorge]

Let me ask you the inverse of your question. What is the definitive stat line in the sand in which Teddy Bridgewater isn't your franchise QB?

You can't answer it because it's an idiotic question. That's why you're not getting any straight answers like 3,632 yards at 64.73% completion rate with 37 TDs and 8 INTs.

It's because no one who understands the sport of football has conversations like this.

[WOW!!]

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If we're in competitive games, sure. If it's garbage time stats, nope.

We might as well start discussing what we do at pass rusher when Stephen Weatherly leads the NFL in sacks and what we do at WR when Pharoh Cooper puts up Julio Jones numbers.

7th post.. You were about to do it.. Went vague on your answer..  Then diverted to some off brand analogy comparing player not even in the same category or situation.. To I guess discredit "the hypothetical " question..lmao

[WOW!!]

And the rest of your post have just been you trying to analyze me for (pointing out correctly) that you haven't answered a simple question.. 

So you haven't answered the question yet 11 post later and still arguing how unreal it is for us to asked hypothetical question about Teddy Bridgewater??

I get it you think he sucks.. But is it really crazy for you to answer a simple question??.. What could he do for you not to think he sucks??

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Let me ask you the inverse of your question. What is the definitive stat line in the sand in which Teddy Bridgewater isn't your franchise QB?

You can't answer it because it's an idiotic question. That's why you're not getting any straight answers like 3,632 yards at 64.73% completion rate with 37 TDs and 8 INTs.

It's because no one who understands the sport of football has conversations like this.

Easy question... watch how its done..

24 or less total TD combined with 15 or more TO comp % under 65 and a QB rating 85 or less.. and less then 4,000 combine yards.. 

Add in context (garbage time numbers) , Alot of fails in competitive times in the game.. And Offense ranked 11th or higher..

Anything in this category would have me looking for his replacement next offseason...

Not hard at all..

[LinvilleGorge]

How is it possible that you don't understand that this is a terribly flawed concept and that's essentially my answer. Your concept is terribly flawed and there is no line in the sand answer which is what you're demanding. 

If you want better answers, don't start with a fatally flawed concept. 

[WOW!!]

26 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No one can answer your question in the fashion that you want it answered because it's a completely idiotic premise. There is no concrete stat line in which Teddy Bridgewater is definitely our crowned franchise QB. Football is a lot more complicated than that. I'm sorry you don't have the self awareness to realize why you've been so thoroughly mocked in this thread.

Wrong..

Simple analogy..

Ryan Tannehill hit some solid numbers in and put that team in a situation.. Where they felt he was the guy and didn't persue Brady.. When they could have had him.. He gave them the confidence that he was their franchise QB..

All I was asking you..(Beyond W-L record) what could Bridgewater do for you to feel the same about him..

Not a hard or crazy question..

[LinvilleGorge]

Just now, WOW!! said:

Wrong..

Simple analogy..

Ryan Tannehill hit some solid numbers in and put that team in a situation.. Where they felt he was the guy and didn't persue Brady.. When they could have had him.. He gave them the confidence that he was their franchise QB..

All I was asking you..(Beyond W-L record) what could Bridgewater do for you to feel the same about him..

Not a hard or crazy question..

If you think that decision was based solely on a stat line then you simply don't understand football, which honestly is becoming very apparent in this thread.

[WOW!!]

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

How is it possible that you don't understand that this is a terribly flawed concept and that's essentially my answer. Your concept is terribly flawed and there is no line in the sand answer which is what you're demanding. 

If you want better answers, don't start with a fatally flawed concept. 

How is it possible that others have no problem with this question.. But you are acting like you've been ask to answer the meaning of life question. ??