Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Bears Trade for Nick Foles


Shocker

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Fox007 said:

lol we will have let the top 3 players we've ever had go for literally NOTHING combined....combined haahahha

 

What do you think Cam is worth?

The bears just told the world they value him less than Nick Foles and a fourth round pick.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tbe said:

What do you think Cam is worth?

The way this has been handled? and after the team played him an entire season with a fuged up shoulder/other injuries/leaving him in the game and QB sneaking when down 21+ points in the final minutes of games/etc/etc/etc/etc/?

What he's worth isn't the funny part that should be fugin obvious. The way the team has handled Cam and our top players all time tells you about the status of our GMs/HCs over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

This is what can be taken from this news.

I disagree.

I think what can be possibly gleaned, is that Cam has made it known that he wants an extension or new deal.....

That's the likely story right now, and I hope Cam isn't the guy caught with no chair when the music stops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chargers seem intent to let Cam hit free agency, and  even then they are undecided.  Cam destined to hit free agency and become a Pat.

Rivera is awfully quiet.  Could he go to Washington?  A smart Cam would stay away from RR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...