Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Georgia has already been caught intentionally manipulating their data, so I'm not sure what to believe out of that state.

There has been reports of data manipulation everywhere.  Claims are some places are inflating their data while others under-reporting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

There has been reports of data manipulation everywhere.  Claims are some places are inflating their data while others under-reporting.

Seems like most of the claims of inflating data have been conspiracy driven. Virtually every virologist and epidemiologist on the planet is onboard with the idea that official cases are far under-reported due to testing numbers. Georgia was straight up changing the dates on their data to show a false downward trend to justify their reopening. Hell, even Trump was saying that Georgia was being reckless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Seems like most of the claims of inflating data have been conspiracy driven. Virtually every virologist and epidemiologist on the planet is onboard with the idea that official cases are far under-reported due to testing numbers. Georgia was straight up changing the dates on their data to show a false downward trend to justify their reopening. Hell, even Trump was saying that Georgia was being reckless.

I don’t think what happened in Georgia is as malicious as you are portraying. At least from the reporting I’ve read. 

Either way, they aren’t doing those things now and numbers aren’t spiking and hospitals are reporting falling case numbers. 

It could be a blip, but we’ll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tbe said:

I don’t think what happened in Georgia is as malicious as you are portraying. At least from the reporting I’ve read. 

Either way, they aren’t doing those things now and numbers aren’t spiking and hospitals are reporting falling case numbers. 

It could be a blip, but we’ll see.

They've made repeated "errors" that forced their governor to publicly apologize. I don't see anyway to paint rearranges dates in data sets to fit the curve you want to portray as an honest mistake. They flat out lied and manipulated data. I don't see why we'd trust them to not be doing it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Seems like most of the claims of inflating data have been conspiracy driven. Virtually every virologist and epidemiologist on the planet is onboard with the idea that official cases are far under-reported due to testing numbers. Georgia was straight up changing the dates on their data to show a false downward trend to justify their reopening. Hell, even Trump was saying that Georgia was being reckless.

Georgia did go a bit fast, I won't deny that.  However, folks in the healthcare field have said the actually death count is probably lower because the hospitals get a government subsidy for having treated a COVID patient that ultimately dies.  To that end, some deaths have been coded COVID-19 just to get money that weren't even COVID related at all.   A local hospital is being sued because they coded a heart attack victim COVID-19 to get the money and the family found out about it through a whistle blower at the hospital.

Edited by 45catfan
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Seems like most of the claims of inflating data have been conspiracy driven. Virtually every virologist and epidemiologist on the planet is onboard with the idea that official cases are far under-reported due to testing numbers. Georgia was straight up changing the dates on their data to show a false downward trend to justify their reopening. Hell, even Trump was saying that Georgia was being reckless.

Several first hand accounts from medical personnel who were told to classify deaths as COVID if they showed any of the symptoms and whether or not they tested positive. Other accounts of patients who tested positive and died who where classified as COVID deaths whether they died of COVID symptoms or something else. I have personally talked to a few nurses who have made similar claims. Now, there may also be some under reporting in some places as well, but let's admit we probably wouldn't bet our paychecks on either side of it. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the very least, the undercounting would cancel out any over counting.


There were a LOT of cases in NYC where people died at home and were never tested because they didn’t make it to the hospital. Firefighters were reporting thousands of at home deaths. 
 

Some of those cases are now being counted as likely Covid deaths, but no one knows the true number.

“Mayor Bill de Blasio acknowledged on Tuesday that the vast majority of deaths taking place at home were likely also due to COVID-19, the disease caused by the virus, meaning the death toll could be as much as 70% higher than currently reported figures.”

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Oh lord, so now some quacks on YouTube and a handful of anecdotal accounts equates to proof of widespread fraud?

There may also be cases of under-reporting when we had a severe shortage of testing supplies until very recently? Well, ya don't say...

Widespread fraud?  Not completely sure how widespread it is, but it's happening.  In the early weeks of the pandemic, positive cases were grossly under-reported (as you stated) and if there is fraud, laziness or just assumption of COVID-19 contributing to inflated deaths rates (as put on death certificates) with simple math...what does that do to the death rate?  At this point, unless the number of positive cases skyrocket and the deaths stop, will the death rate shrink in any meaningful way.   

This is a bad pandemic, there's zero doubt about it, but these 4%-6% death rates are not realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tbe said:

At the very least, the undercounting would cancel out any over counting.


There were a LOT of cases in NYC where people died at home and were never tested because they didn’t make it to the hospital. Firefighters were reporting thousands of at home deaths. 
 

Some of those cases are now being counted as likely Covid deaths, but no one knows the true number.

“Mayor Bill de Blasio acknowledged on Tuesday that the vast majority of deaths taking place at home were likely also due to COVID-19, the disease caused by the virus, meaning the death toll could be as much as 70% higher than currently reported figures.”

Yeah, virtually every virologist and epidemiologist on that planet who are highly specialized in this regard strongly disagree with this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, virtually every virologist and epidemiologist on that planet who are highly specialized in this regard strongly disagree with this.

They all think we are over-counting?

Edited by Tbe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • 100%.  You have to play the cards that are dealt.  Not the cards you wish were dealt.
    • I'd say its definitely going to be addressed this off-season.  We went into the last draft with a roster of RBs including:  Chubba, Blackshear, and Miles Sanders. We picked Jonathan Brooks in the second and still signed Rashaad Penny afterwards.  Fast forward....One turned into a top 10 back, 1 is injured/out for most if not all the '25 season, 1 retired, 1 will either take a huge paycut or be cut, and the last is a restricted free agent. We brought in Mike Boone as well. Add him to the free agent list also.  We need a physical option.    Which qualifies:  Ashton Jeanty(Boise St): Overall ranked Top 10. Almost 2k yards after contact, 28 tds. Would take our first rounder. My money would be on an NFC East team selecting him. (97.2 PFF run grade) - 121 forced missed tackles.  Omarion Hampton(UNC): Ranked everywhere from 20 - 59 overall. Consensus #2 back after Jeanty. He'll be a second rounder. 1,222 Yards after contact w/ 15 tds.  (90.5 PFF run grade) - 72 forced missed Tackles Kaleb Johnson(Iowa): Ranked from 38 - 69 depending on which media outlet you prefer but generally #3. 2nd/3rd possibly. 1,060 Yards after contact w/ 21 tds.(86.7 PFF run grade)- 66 forced missed tackles Cam Skattebo: Ranked from the 50's - 104. Every mock I do he ends up BPA at some point. 969 Yards after contact w/ 17 tds(92 PFF Run Grade). Probably the best receiving back of the group. 81 forced missed tackles.  If the '24 and '25 draft classes were combined, IMO the rankings would be, in order: Jeanty, Hampton, Brooks, Johnson, Skattebo. I wouldn't take one high but I'd take one for Chubba and Brooks insurance. 
    • https://forums.ea.com/discussions/fc-25-general-discussion-en/ayuda-guide-cu%C3%A1nto-cobra-aerom%C3%A9xico-por-cambiar-un-vuelo/11904762
×
×
  • Create New...