Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Corona Virus


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Where are the massive outbreaks? Those viruses aren't very biologically successful.

They are both Coronavirus’ that preceded this one. We never developed a vaccine for either of the two former viruses. The point is can a vaccine be developed at all, if they are struggling to get a vaccination for the previous two iterations and had twenty years to make one.

Edited by philit99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, philit99 said:

They are both Coronavirus’ that preceded this one. We never developed a vaccine for either of the two former viruses. The point is can a vaccine be developed at all, if they are struggling to get a vaccination for the previous two iterations and had twenty years to make one.

Those viruses weren't very biologically successful and vaccine development is very costly, both in monetary terms and resources. The outbreaks didn't last long enough for the early vaccine efforts to come to fruition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, philit99 said:

They are both Coronavirus’ that preceded this one. We never developed a vaccine for either of the two former viruses. The point is can a vaccine be developed at all, if they are struggling to get a vaccination for the previous two iterations and had twenty years to make one.

Developers won’t make money from those vaccines. If they were highly contagious and deadly a vaccine would be developed.

Edited by Car123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Those viruses weren't very biologically successful and vaccine development is very costly, both in monetary terms and resources. The outbreaks didn't last long enough for the early vaccine efforts to come to fruition. 

And from what little I have read and know about it, we are light years ahead of where we were during those outbreaks medical technology wise as far as drug/vacs development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, stirs said:

After suspicion of China cheating on numbers, they suddenly find 1300 new deaths in one day.

there's speculation that china's death toll was actually in the several 10s of millions. someone got to this number by the sudden cancellation of cell phones. 

long story short thats either the explanation or a bunch of click farms suddenly went offline. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Following the SARS outbreak in 2003, researchers produced a vaccine that made it to phase one human trials, which test the safety of a new drug. But the effort never progressed further, mainly due to shifting research priorities as the outbreak came to an end, says Dr. Anthony Fauci, the longtime and current director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

 https://time.com/5768956/wuhan-coronavirus-vaccine-treatment/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

there's speculation that china's death toll was actually in the several 10s of millions. someone got to this number by the sudden cancellation of cell phones. 

long story short thats either the explanation or a bunch of click farms suddenly went offline. 

Not even China can cover up tens of millions of deaths. We'll never get a real number out of them and I suspect the real number is significantly higher than the reported number, likely by several magnitudes but several 10s of millions? Nah, not a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Not even China can cover up tens of millions of deaths. We'll never get a real number out of them and I suspect the real number is significantly higher than the reported number, likely by several magnitudes but several 10s of millions? Nah, not a chance.

yeah there's also a poo load of weird things going on like someone just filming truck after truck leaving this factory in urns and extrapolated it to a similar number but obviously you're going down a rabbit hole there with a bunch of people you generally don't want to associate with

also morbidly if you told me 30 million died in india and they just didn't report it, after having lived there, i'd absolutely believe it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

yeah there's also a poo load of weird things going on like someone just filming truck after truck leaving this factory in urns and extrapolated it to a similar number but obviously you're going down a rabbit hole there with a bunch of people you generally don't want to associate with

also morbidly if you told me 30 million died in india and they just didn't report it, after having lived there, i'd absolutely believe it 

Just do the math. Even if everyone in China contracted the virus and we figure an overall 2% mortality rate of the infected (not confirmed infected, but overall infected), that's 27M dead. The virus just isn't lethal enough to kill tens of millions in China.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Just do the math. Even if everyone in China contracted the virus and we figure an overall 2% mortality rate of the infected (not confirmed infected, but overall infected), that's 27M dead. The virus just isn't lethal enough to kill tens of millions in China.

China healthcare and sanitation are trash.  Factor in decades of polluted air and severe respiratory disease among Chinese, It likely be higher than 2%.

Edited by Ja Rhule
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ja Rhule said:

China healthcare and sanitation are trash.  Factor in decades of polluted air and severe respiratory disease among Chinese, It likely be higher than 2%.

Even if it is substantially higher than 2% in China, that 27M figure was assuming literally ever last person in China was infected which certainly is nowhere near the case. Let's say 20% of the Hubei Province became infected and they experienced a 10% mortality rate. That adds up to roughly 1.2M. Then lets say 5% of the rest of China became infected (which I think is highly unlikely given China's lockdown of the Hubei Province) and they experienced a 5% mortality rate as their medical facilities weren't overrun. That adds up to another 3.2M. That's a total of 4.4M. 

I have no problem assuming China's actual numbers are several, perhaps even many magnitudes greater than they're reporting. I think several magnitudes higher is highly likely. But tens of millions? Nope, not even coming close to buying that. 100k dead in the Hubei Province though? Honestly, that wouldn't terribly shock me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering how contagious this is and the population density there, you have to believe a ton of people died or were critical before authorities even grasped what was going on.

Either that or they knew what the virus was and that it was out very early. If so, I wonder how they figured it out so fast? *sarcasm*

Edited by Tbe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For the silly people that worship her it will be that.  The Coleman 'legend' thing, they did that with another fairly average player that was here and I sort of mocked or questioned the 'legend' status. Instantly caught crap for insulting someone's favorite Panther. So okay, Kurt Coleman is a Legend. 
    • You allow him to compete--you all are talking as if I am proposing making him the starter. Give him a new coach, new weapons, good OL, etc. and see what happens. You are saying, "Well Damn.  It did not work for 3 guys..."  Right now, our C is injured, we lost our top 2 WRs.  Better question:  If you need a QB, Why would you not take a chance on bringing in a QB who was a former first rounder, a good arm, intelligence, mobility, youth, etc.  and see how he does out of NY--with a better OL, better running game, better receivers.  I am not saying give him a 10-year contract, I am saying give him a chance. You act like there is no improvement on offense here--it was a 2 year process, and next year is year 2.  To me, how can you sit there with Bryce and an opportunity to sign a veteran QB on the cheap comes available and you say--"Not us. We're good.  We are waiting for Patrick Mahommes."  Jone's problem is obviously mental--and he has little support.  Why is this so frigging hard to comprehend.  It is called "bottom fishing" and it is better than sitting in the boat.  
    • I think we're going to fall from behind quite early and be forced to abandon the run game.  3 rushes -2 yards 1 catch -10 yards 
×
×
  • Create New...