Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tale of the Tape - Russell Okung


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

Good read / clips on the newest Panther's LT-

https://theriotreport.com/russell-okung-film-breakdown-panthers/

 

Quote

 

Run Blocking

It is worth noting at this point that Okung did struggle with a lower body issue last season after he missed most of the first half of the season with a blood clot, and that even when he was on the field last season there is a chance that he wasn’t playing at peak health after missing a lot of workouts due to the larger issue that kept him off the roster to begin the season. However, with that said, his run blocking does raise some concerns. For a start, he didn’t play with great pad level, making it hard for him to generate any consistent movement (Okung is at left tackle, wearing #76):

 

 

Quote

 

Pass Protection

At the end of the day, pass protection for offensive tackles tends to be limited by foot speed, with technique allowing players to cover almost everything apart from just being run around. While nobody is perfect, Okung does show good foot speed with the ability to force edge rushers wide around the edge:

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I like this deal more and more every day.

If the guy turns out to be the next Matt Kalil, he costs us nothing after this year.  If he turns into the next Jordan Gross, we get first shot at putting him on a longer term deal.

Trai Turner wasn't getting better, in fact, it could be argued he was going the other direction.  For a relatively same number of dollars, we're trying to put a tackle on the field versus a guard.  I just don't see the down side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DeAngelo Beason said:

Trai Turner was steeply declining.  I'm not really sure how he managed to back his way into the pro bowl the past two years.  

He's been an alternate is how, he hasn't actually ''made'' the pro-bowl lately. 

Awards like 1st / 2nd team All-Pro are a better indication of how good a player is across their peers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BrianS said:

Honestly, I like this deal more and more every day.

If the guy turns out to be the next Matt Kalil, he costs us nothing after this year.  If he turns into the next Jordan Gross, we get first shot at putting him on a longer term deal.

Trai Turner wasn't getting better, in fact, it could be argued he was going the other direction.  For a relatively same number of dollars, we're trying to put a tackle on the field versus a guard.  I just don't see the down side.

That is where I'm at, this is a deal that we could do a few thing with, there is no guaranteed money, it's just the salary, if we wanted to save the 13M out right, we could. 

If we want to let it fall off after next season as we bridge to Little we can. 

If he shows he has a few good years left we can extend. 

We all know LT > RG, we will be able to replace OG, and now we have legitimate LT depth for the first time in a while. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...