Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Russell Okung - Leads The Way (Worth a Watch)


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

Russell comes across as very sharp and intelligent. When those type guys have the physical skills, they are usually one of your best options. Excited about having this guy on the roster this year. Not a Hurney fan by any means but so far liking this move. Takes a lot of pressure off draft wise and opens up options. Okung probably a better option than any rookie tackle we could have drafted so in a critical year for Cam, this is huge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love that Carolina picked this guy up and hes a Servant first" thank you Lord Jesus Christ" He was used to Glory God and leave his mark in LA now he will leave his mark in Carolina.. We all have a purpose if its for good or bad our choice" Every Word that exits our mouth gives life or death to all that hears it.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People do forget this guy has some rings and protected Wilson when that line was worth a poo. However, much like everything on this team currently, his play and this move is just up in the air. My question is where the fug was this last year instead of reaching on two fuging tackles in the draft hurney? Or any other year where we clearly needed a left tackle and drafting someone not in the top ten and calling them a started was clearly the answer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RumHam said:

People do forget this guy has some rings and protected Wilson when that line was worth a poo. However, much like everything on this team currently, his play and this move is just up in the air. My question is where the fug was this last year instead of reaching on two fuging tackles in the draft hurney? Or any other year where we clearly needed a left tackle and drafting someone not in the top ten and calling them a started was clearly the answer?

The option has to be available w/o breaking the resource cabinet too, a T at the top of the 2nd is not a reach, and neither was Daley in the 6th. The 3 corner DG draft was reaches on Worley, and Sanchez. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

The option has to be available w/o breaking the resource cabinet too, a T at the top of the 2nd is not a reach, and neither was Daley in the 6th. The 3 corner DG draft was reaches on Worley, and Sanchez. 

here we go, hurnder apologists. Pretty sure those two weren't drafted near as high. Try again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okung seems like an intelligent man that has his priorities straight in life.  I hope he can stay healthy and help us this year.  It will be a solid pick up if so.  No offense to Trai Turner, but a solid LT is 10x more important than a solid RG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, RumHam said:

People do forget this guy has some rings and protected Wilson when that line was worth a poo. However, much like everything on this team currently, his play and this move is just up in the air. My question is where the fug was this last year instead of reaching on two fuging tackles in the draft hurney? Or any other year where we clearly needed a left tackle and drafting someone not in the top ten and calling them a started was clearly the answer?

You may be confusing the term reach for steal as it pertains to Daley. Daley graded out similarly to Dillard who was the first tackle drafted. Getting anything out of a 6th round pick is gravy. Getting one who is at worst solid depth at both guard and tackle, and potentially a serviceable starter, is a huge bonus. 

Of course I'm sure your angst is primarily towards Little (although I'd say the jury is still out on him). But when you exaggerate your points to give them more weight, you just end up cheapening your argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Peon Awesome said:

You may be confusing the term reach for steal as it pertains to Daley. Daley graded out similarly to Dillard who was the first tackle drafted. Getting anything out of a 6th round pick is gravy. Getting one who is at worst solid depth at both guard and tackle, and potentially a serviceable starter, is a huge bonus. 

Of course I'm sure your angst is primarily towards Little (although I'd say the jury is still out on him). But when you exaggerate your points to give them more weight, you just end up cheapening your argument.

say what?  Dillard was always projected in the first and daley I believe was 5th round at best

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, SetfreexX said:

 

 

He certainly comes across as thoughtful and intelligent, but let's keep in mind that this video was produced by the 700 Club, of the Christian Broadcasting Network, so it understandably stresses his spiritual side, not his violent side.

What seems to me more important about this trade is the value he adds to our OL, and the signal it sends that a rebuild is not a tank.  Turner was going anyway, and we got good value with this replacement, while at the same time, putting proven strength at a more vital position.  Protecting Cam from the LT spot is vital to success, and to me, this is another sign that Rhule wants Cam at QB, and he wants him to be protected.

An ancillary benefit is that Van Roten won"t have to babysit a series of LTs who relied on him to reposition them.  GVR has gotten a lot of bad reviews in the Huddle, and IMO, undeservedly so.  He's an effective zone blocker, always a big factor in every big run that CMC broke last year, and he's probably going to be a better pass blocker, now that Okung's here, and he's freed up to do his job, without added responsibilities of having to help out novice LTs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...