Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers need to do what ever it takes to draft Denzel Mims

Eazy-E

By Eazy-E,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Real1zOnly Newbie

Real1zOnly

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, (ATL'ien)CamNewton said:

He won't be there in the second round.

Jeudy at 7

We are not taken a WR with the #7 pick. We taking Simmons or Brown whoever is available of the 2. Not much else to discuss, unless we plan on trading up for a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Real1zOnly said:

We are not taken a WR with the #7 pick. We taking Simmons or Brown whoever is available of the 2. Not much else to discuss, unless we plan on trading up for a QB.

Brown had a bad combine.  I think he falls.  If we still like him we should trade back IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites
d-dave Veteran

d-dave

Posted
Posted

Brett Kollmann is really insightful.  The way he breaks down player strengths is really interesting to watch.

I'd love to get Mims in the draft.  He's got talent, and the smarts to make plays.  No problems there.  Not at 7, but if we end up trading down and picking up a high 2nd pick, I have no problem snapping him up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Khyber53 Grand Master

Khyber53

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, ncfan said:

Again people keep ignoring 

We're going to be running 3 WR 1 TE NOT the 2 TE 2 WR sets Rivera ran

 

So ill repeat we'll run

1 TE: Ian Thomas AND Manhurtz under contract

3 WR: Moore, Samuel, and.........?

 

 

WR is actually the bigger need.  People just assume just because Olsen left that we need a TE.  

I'm not sold on Ian Thomas yet. Not at all.

He wasn't exactly pushing for that number one spot and didn't make a blip on the radar at any point when Greg was out over the last couple of years. Just sayin'...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted

I love the guy.. Everything I see on him looks like a Mike Thomas clone.. He checks off so many boxes and I wouldn't have any reservations if he was the pick in the 2nd.. But we have so many holes on the defense now..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Madwolf Rising Star

Madwolf

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

Please don’t ever give Hurney the option of “whatever it takes”.  That outcome will not be in our favor.  

We trade up from #7 in the 2nd to #6 by giving up next years 1st and 2nd, this years 2nd, CMC, Cam Newton, Burns, and throw in Moore just to make sure the deal goes through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, ncfan said:

I dont expect him to go before our 2nd pick.  This WR class is just insane.

 

But id absolutely love to grab this kid.

 

A WR is going to be Olsen's replacement, people keep ignoring.

Joe Bradys offense is going to be 3WR 1 TE sets.  Not 2 and 2 what Rivera ran.

We have Moore and Samuel (injured prone and going into last year on deal) and thats IT at WR. 

Im not on board drafting a WR rd 1.  But rd 2 and on im fine.  We just need talent Period.  You dont pass on a DJ level talent at WR in the 2nd just because we have other holes.

I concur, he had the best 3-cone out of everyone too. His combine is a copy of Juilo Jones at the same size too. Best WR class and all, he did his best to show the teams in the late 1st hes more than worthy. Having a top five combine will do that. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...