Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Panthers need to do what ever it takes to draft Denzel Mims


Eazy-E

Recommended Posts

I want Mims as our second rounder but i'm starting to think he is going to go much higher than expected.

He would pair so nicely with Moore and Samuel that I think it would be worth doing what it takes to get him even if it means trading back into the first round or trading back to gain some extra picks to flip into another first. I'm sure Matt Rhule wants him on this team just as much as I do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

Please don’t ever give Hurney the option of “whatever it takes”.  That outcome will not be in our favor.  

Ain’t that the truth. No player is worth whatever it takes. Especially when you start trading future first/second round draft picks to get them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont expect him to go before our 2nd pick.  This WR class is just insane.

 

But id absolutely love to grab this kid.

 

A WR is going to be Olsen's replacement, people keep ignoring.

Joe Bradys offense is going to be 3WR 1 TE sets.  Not 2 and 2 what Rivera ran.

We have Moore and Samuel (injured prone and going into last year on deal) and thats IT at WR. 

Im not on board drafting a WR rd 1.  But rd 2 and on im fine.  We just need talent Period.  You dont pass on a DJ level talent at WR in the 2nd just because we have other holes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ncfan said:

I dont expect him to go before our 2nd pick.  This WR class is just insane.

 

But id absolutely love to grab this kid.

 

A WR is going to be Olsen's replacement, people keep ignoring.

Joe Bradys offense is going to be 3WR 1 TE sets.  Not 2 and 2 what Rivera ran.

We have Moore and Samuel (injured prone and going into last year on deal) and thats IT at WR. 

Im not on board drafting a WR rd 1.  But rd 2 and on im fine.  We just need talent Period.  You dont pass on a DJ level talent at WR in the 2nd just because we have other holes.

If we go defense in the first, which it really looks like we are, I still want to get some more line help in the second or one of the top linebackers.  I think the wr class is so deep we can afford to wait.

 

Having said that, Mims looks like the real deal and I wouldnt hate the pick if he was there in the 2nd.  But damn at some point we have to fix our oline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

If we go defense in the first, which it really looks like we are, I still want to get some more line help in the second or one of the top linebackers.  I think the wr class is so deep we can afford to wait.

 

Having said that, Mims looks like the real deal and I wouldnt hate the pick if he was there in the 2nd.  But damn at some point we have to fix our oline

Id love to fix the OL as well.  But we need help point blank.

Im not taking a OL with a lower grade who is just a guy who has potential to become a starter. Over a WR who has a High grade who will be a day impact guy with potential to be a star.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Id love to fix the OL as well.  But we need help point blank.

Im not taking a OL with a lower grade who is just a guy who has potential to become a starter. Over a WR who has a High grade who will be a day impact guy with potential to be a star.

for sure

 

But truth be told we need more bodies on the line then we need wr and I think the 2nd round is full of interior lineman and centers.

 

But again those highlights of mims from the senior bowl has me drooling

https://nflmocks.com/2020/01/26/denzel-mims-2020-nfl-draft-stock-senior-bowl/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So many places with holes on the team, just not sure we're spending early draft capital on any receivers. Maybe a TE, but I don't see more receivers right now.

The advantage of this being such a strong class for receivers and QBs is that it may clear up some excellent prospects in other positions to fall to us late in second day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

So many places with holes on the team, just not sure we're spending early draft capital on any receivers. Maybe a TE, but I don't see more receivers right now.

The advantage of this being such a strong class for receivers and QBs is that it may clear up some excellent prospects in other positions to fall to us late in second day.

Again people keep ignoring 

We're going to be running 3 WR 1 TE NOT the 2 TE 2 WR sets Rivera ran

 

So ill repeat we'll run

1 TE: Ian Thomas AND Manhurtz under contract

3 WR: Moore, Samuel, and.........?

 

 

WR is actually the bigger need.  People just assume just because Olsen left that we need a TE.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Again people keep ignoring 

We're going to be running 3 WR 1 TE NOT the 2 TE 2 WR sets Rivera ran

 

So ill repeat we'll run

1 TE: Ian Thomas AND Manhurtz under contract

3 WR: Moore, Samuel, and.........?

 

 

WR is actually the bigger need.  People just assume just because Olsen left that we need a TE.  

This is a huge wrong answer when we need to fix major holes with DL and OL(top need) and get the best available WR later in the draft.We need to get protection for the QB first thing over anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We do not need offensive help NEARLY the same way we need defensive help.  We had 12 players start 9 or more games in 2019.  Of those 12 players, only three are guaranteed to return.  We are at risk of losing 75% of our defensive starters!

Now listen, our defense was historically bad.  Just awful.  It probably needs heavy turnover.  But the only way to support that is by investing incredibly heavily in drafting for that.  Drafting a WR when we already have two is a luxury we just can't afford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BrianS said:

We do not need offensive help NEARLY the same way we need defensive help.  We had 12 players start 9 or more games in 2019.  Of those 12 players, only three are guaranteed to return.  We are at risk of losing 75% of our defensive starters!

Now listen, our defense was historically bad.  Just awful.  It probably needs heavy turnover.  But the only way to support that is by investing incredibly heavily in drafting for that.  Drafting a WR when we already have two is a luxury we just can't afford.

Why not leave the QB wide open to get sacked with no highly needed protection. I Gotcha!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

We don’t have to pull a Greg Little on this one. He’ll be there in the second for us to grab 

I hope you’re right because he would be a huge addition to our offense.

 

23 minutes ago, BrianS said:

We do not need offensive help NEARLY the same way we need defensive help.  We had 12 players start 9 or more games in 2019.  Of those 12 players, only three are guaranteed to return.  We are at risk of losing 75% of our defensive starters!

Now listen, our defense was historically bad.  Just awful.  It probably needs heavy turnover.  But the only way to support that is by investing incredibly heavily in drafting for that.  Drafting a WR when we already have two is a luxury we just can't afford.

With that much turnover, fixing the defense will not happen overnight. If Cam comes back healthy, this offense only needs a few pieces to have huge potential.

With that said, I picked 5 defensive players in my mock draft. Only offensive players I drafted were Denzel Mims and a OG/C. Even with a defensive draft that side of the ball needs a lot of work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...