Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So...Defensively, What Would You / Should We Do*


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

For the sake of it, and to not have another Cam thread...In my opinion as bad as the offense was, I think we are good QB play / OL depth from fielding a top 15 unit with Brady at the helm and some of our skill position options to date, the depth can be addressed via FA or draft and by keeping Cam.

So let's operate with that in mind, at least while regarding the defense 

Our pass rush I believe finished 2nd in total sacks, a fairly impressive feat for a team that was so poor vs the run / trailed to often, considering who we have, and who is now a free agent, what would you do / what should we do...

 

Marquee Free Agents:

James Bradberry

Mario Addison

Vernon Butler

Bruce Irvin

Ross Cockrell

Tre' Boston

Javien Elliott

 

We still have the following under contract for 2020: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/carolina-panthers/cap/ )

DL - KK Short / Dontari Poe / Efe Obada

Edge - Brian Burns / Marquis Haynes / Christian Miller 

ILB - Shaq Thompson / Jermaine Carter Jr. / Andre Smith / Jordan Kunaszyk

DB - Donte' Jackson / Corn Elder / Cole Luke

FS - Jones / Quinn Blanding

SS - Reid / TJ Green / Natrell Jamerson 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First thing you have to do is figure out your base defense, and at this point I believe the best option is to stay the course on converting to a 3-4, instead of reverting back to the 4-3.

While I've always preferred the 4-3, the 3-4 is more versatile on the field, and for the FO. It is simply easier to get the players to run the system, and they're typically cheaper than those required to run the 4-3.

If we run the 3-4 there will be quite a few skilled, young NTs available in the upcoming free agency market, and Brown is a beast in the draft if you go that direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm inclined to select Simmons over Brown at the moment, I think 2nd level versatility / athleticism is the key to a quality defense aside from the pass rush / defending the run. And based on the ''current roster'' with Poe and KK I think I'd like Simmons at 7. 

The LB's that can do it all are rare; he can play the run, cover, and blitz, then factor in ''elite'' athleticism / size. As disruptive as Brown and Kinlaw are I think Simmons' skill set is elite at the next level and would be a good fit next to Shaq. (The 2nd level pursuit would be crazy for us - Burns / Shaq / Simmons) 

And until I see Poe released, I don't see us taking Brown or Kinlaw, DL depth in FA or Day 2 of the draft would be the move in this scenario**

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No matter what happens we will be bad next year on defense just based off what we have/the free agents who may be gone/ the weird in between personnel of a 4-3/3-4. We were horrible last year but  I bet everything I have that people will still scream to fire Snow if he doesn’t turn us into a top 10 defense this year. Offense is much easier, you get a vet LT (Whitworth) or draft one with #7 overall pick and go with a FA guard or develop Daley into the role and use Little as backup LT and you are set...if we keep Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SetfreexX said:

I'm inclined to select Simmons over Brown at the moment, I think 2nd level versatility / athleticism is the key to a quality defense aside from the pass rush / defending the run. And based on the ''current roster'' with Poe and KK I think I'd like Simmons at 7. 

The LB's that can do it all are rare; he can play the run, cover, and blitz, then factor in ''elite'' athleticism / size. As disruptive as Brown and Kinlaw are I think Simmons' skill set is elite at the next level and would be a good fit next to Shaq. (The 2nd level pursuit would be crazy for us - Burns / Shaq / Simmons) 

And until I see Poe released, I don't see us taking Brown or Kinlaw, DL depth in FA or Day 2 of the draft would be the move in this scenario**

Two of the worst defenses in the NFL last season were anchored by Luke Kuechly and Bobby Wager, hands down the two best MLBs in the game. Just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

DO not underestimate the need at MLB and CB.  Luke is gone and it is not smart to re-sign Bradberry, it seems.

Javien Elliott was our highest rated cornerback!

https://www.derp/2020/1/9/21057621/final-2019-ratings-for-all-carolina-panthers-defensive-players-per-pro-football-focus

Just noting that Tre Boston was our 2nd rated defensive player and played 100% of defensive stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Two of the worst defenses in the NFL last season were anchored by Luke Kuechly and Bobby Wager, hands down the two best MLBs in the game. Just saying.

Pretty sure Wagner had the same problems Luke had . . . DL was terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Two of the worst defenses in the NFL last season were anchored by Luke Kuechly and Bobby Wager, hands down the two best MLBs in the game. Just saying.

Seattle also had a terrible pass rush, I think more than anything it goes to show how important QB is, because even with a bad defense, they made the playoffs. 

We also shared a slew of injuries up front on defense, and still finished 2nd in sacks.

And when both of these teams were at their best they had All-Pro MLBs at the helm, just saying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...