Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jameis Winston underwent LASIK surgery to repair his vision


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

1) no, it’s unconfortable for 5-15 minutes per eye though. More liked an irritated itch than pain. LASIK is about 10-15 minutes per eye, PRK is like 5 minutes per eye. 
 

2) lasik was a few days of having to wear shades always and liberally applying eye drops. PRK is supposedly quite a bit longer, 2 or 3 weeks I think I heard. 
 

3) for me? Zero dollars. I’m in the military heh

 

the two best things about it are no more for itchy and dry eyes from wearing contacts and no more migraines from wearing glasses, which I almost never wore because of the migraines (as well as no more periods of near blindness when I have to take my contacts out).

My eyes are now like there was never anything wrong with them. Perfect vision, no maintenance or anything, no discomfort, the impact it’s had on my quality of life is almost indescribable. There are three events in my life that utterly changed everything for me forever: marriage, birth of first kid, lasik.  

awesome ill do this eventually

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mind boggling this wasn't the first thing Winston did the moment he got his first NFL paycheck. Sure, let's throw the ball towards that red blob that could be a fan wearing a jacket.

1 hour ago, The Huddler said:

1) does it hurt

2) how long is recovery

3) how much is it $$$

 

 

im strongly considering.  glasses and contacts will not last in the apocalypse

1. For me, my eyes were a bit tender aftewards. Only lasted an hour or two, though. Procedure might be even better than it was when I did it over ten years ago.

2. Patches over both eyes for the first few hours and heavily tinted shades for about a week. Results are immediate, however.

3. My all-LASIK procedure was over $3,000 but they did provide financing. I would not try to save money going with a cheaper method or someone other than a well regarded professional. Some health plans might help defray the costs as well.

And the only regret of doing it was not doing it sooner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It blows my mind that the dude chose to play football without being able to see for poo. Why?

Then again, maybe his vision wasn't that bad and his agent told him, "Look man, we gotta do something for me to try to be able to explain why you threw it to the wrong fuging team 30 times last season."

Well as I understand it, not only does your vision have to be so bad but you also have to be a certain age. My ex was blind as a bat but didn’t qualify until she hit her early 30s for whatever reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JawnyBlaze said:

1) no, it’s unconfortable for 5-15 minutes per eye though. More liked an irritated itch than pain. LASIK is about 10-15 minutes per eye, PRK is like 5 minutes per eye. 
 

2) lasik was a few days of having to wear shades always and liberally applying eye drops. PRK is supposedly quite a bit longer, 2 or 3 weeks I think I heard. 
 

3) for me? Zero dollars. I’m in the military heh

 

the two best things about it are no more for itchy and dry eyes from wearing contacts and no more migraines from wearing glasses, which I almost never wore because of the migraines (as well as no more periods of near blindness when I have to take my contacts out).

My eyes are now like there was never anything wrong with them. Perfect vision, no maintenance or anything, no discomfort, the impact it’s had on my quality of life is almost indescribable. There are three events in my life that utterly changed everything for me forever: marriage, birth of first kid, lasik.  

PRK hurts like a mother and your eyes are super sensitive for about a day. after that, it’s all good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never worn glasses but about 18 years ago it got to where I couldn't read graphics on tv from across the room. So my wife and I got Lasik the same day. She had worn thick glasses so she was thrilled. It was great for me too. The only tradeoff was my near vision was degraded a little. Although I can still read, I use reading glasses for long reads. Still glad I did it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, The Huddler said:

1) does it hurt

2) how long is recovery

3) how much is it $$$

 

 

im strongly considering.  glasses and contacts will not last in the apocalypse

1) Per other poster - you'll be asleep after the surgery for about 24 hours because of the drugs (ask for them!) but when you wake up it might feel like you've got sand in your eyes for a day.  It passes and you'll hardly notice because you'll be 20/15.

2) See above.  The flap will never heal but it is not a problem.  It will only be an issue if years down the road new procedures become available or if you decide to have an enhancement.  Most doctors will not re-lift a flap if it's more than a few weeks old.  Some will.  If you're concerned about the flap get PRK but recovery is days to week+.

3) Depends on your manifest (prescription) but typically budget between $1,500 and $2,000 per eye despite the low cost advertising - basically you'll only get a $600 Lasik if you don't actually need lasik.  

4) There is a new (recently FDA approved) procedure called SMILE that can only be performed by a specific machine (Ziess is currently the only one with FDA approval in the US).   Normal Lasik requires a femtosecond laser to cut the flap and an excimer laser to ablate the cornea - SMILE does away with the excimer and is supposed to be even less painful.  Drawback is that it can't do everything that an excimer laser can do and outcomes are not quite as good.   

5) Don't have it if you are planning on getting pregnant as pregnancy will often change your prescription.

6) There is a new procedure on the horizon but still years away that uses a femtosecond laser to create a grid pattern on your cornea.  It doesn't actually ablate (remove) an organic material but the grid pattern will change the way light travels through your eye and thus your vision (it changes your refractive index).  It doesn't require flaps or ablation so it's kind of the "holy grail" of the industry.   I wouldn't wait for it - it's been under development for 10+ years with seemingly very little progress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also for those 20 and 30 somethings considering Lasik ...

What you don't know (yet) is that as you get older you will have other, unrelated vision issues with the big 2 being :

1) presbyopia - you won't be able to focus crisply on anything closer than 2 feet away without reading glasses

2) dry eye - especially for those of you that have been staring at a screen since you were 6 years old.

When you start to experience these things remember it has nothing to do with your lasik - your lasik didn't cause it and it's not because your lasik is "degrading".  It's because your getting old and that sucks in multiple ways.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, DamnItJake! said:

Da ball worked good at FSU not NFL!! Imagine that

Eh, Winston was known to be poor with ball security in college as well.  I know Jake broke down at the end due to injuries, but he did attribute some of his early success to having lasik surgery as well while he was with the saints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ok2h8pep said:

Also for those 20 and 30 somethings considering Lasik ...

What you don't know (yet) is that as you get older you will have other, unrelated vision issues with the big 2 being :

1) presbyopia - you won't be able to focus crisply on anything closer than 2 feet away without reading glasses

2) dry eye - especially for those of you that have been staring at a screen since you were 6 years old.

When you start to experience these things remember it has nothing to do with your lasik - your lasik didn't cause it and it's not because your lasik is "degrading".  It's because your getting old and that sucks in multiple ways.

 

Yea good point bringing up the age. I didn’t think to mention when I got it I was 32 and my eye doctor said I was right in the sweet spot for lasik. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is factually incorrect. He was a two time Pro Bowler with the Rams and in fact statistically he was better with the Rams in his best season there than he has been with the Lions(could change with this season). Some of his per game stats have creeped into being marginally better with the Lions but there have not been dramatic differences in his play, actually. The biggest reason that McVay and he ended up splitting was McVay didn't think he could win a title with Goff. TBH.....so far he was 100% correct. Stafford almost immediately won them a SB and Goff in a historic run was about 70% of the reason the Lions faltered in the NFC championship game. He missed critical throws all over the first half and throughout the second half that he normally wouldn't. He choked. So, until Goff actually does win a SB...McVay has been right.
    • they have the best defense they've had in a long time...probably the best in the reid/mahommes era.  but i think they are probably the most beatable they've been in a while as well. record doesn't exactly bear that out, but they just don't look as strong on offense as they usually do. lots of reasons for that, like trying to build chemistry with newer receivers, but right now they just aren't as frightening as they typically are. i mean they'll probably win tomorrow, but i don't see them as the strongest team in the AFC right now. 
    • He will likely remain unsigned the remainder of this season(barring someone being in a pure QB panic AND making poor decisions) largely due to the cost. I do think he will get multiple offers to be a backup QB and perhaps a couple to potentially start this offseason.  I will continue to beat the same horse over and over.....he should go to a successful team with an established starter. If I were him, go to somewhere like SF, LAR, etc. Somewhere with a successful QB coach and brilliant offensive mind and ALSO a set situation at QB. Ride the pine and adjust for a year or two. Chill and be around better culture. I would suggest the same for Bryce but he will be limited to wherever we can trade him. 
×
×
  • Create New...