Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"Mutually agreed to part ways"


Bronn

Recommended Posts

So, anyone have any idea what exactly this means?

Olsen was under contract for this coming year. To me, this sounds like verbiage that indicates we're going separate ways, but it isn't necessarily an outright cut at the moment. We are possibly not-so-publicly indicating that he is on the trade block. But, then again, one would assume that it is poor form/showing your hand if you're already letting other teams know he's on the market, unless you expect them to start "bidding" on him when they officially can, which could be genius.

 

LOL It is just really weird imho that they're using this phrase.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greg wasn’t going to retire without making sure we wouldn’t come after any bonus money. This just puts in place that he can move on knowing we will release him first. With Marty in place, going after money wasn’t going to happen but Greg isn’t stupid and he knows Marty isn’t guaranteed to be around forever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, hepcat said:

Hurney told Greg that Cam isn't in the plans going forward and he said fug that I want no part of a rebuild for 5 years I either want to win now or go make millions of dollars sitting in an expensive chair talking about football

source?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

Greg wasn’t going to retire without making sure we wouldn’t come after any bonus money. This just puts in place that he can move on knowing we will release him first. With Marty in place, going after money wasn’t going to happen but Greg isn’t stupid and he knows Marty isn’t guaranteed to be around forever.

Correct.  He will be cut, and that was agreed upon.

Greg wasn't going to retire (at this point) to make sure they wouldn't come after any of his money, not that Hurney would have anyway.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it’s us releasing him but doing it in a nice way and honestly he’s probably happy to be released so because both agreed on what to do going forward they just made it nice and easy and said “mutual.”

 

I mean it’s clear as day this is the right move for both sides. Greg doesn’t want to be a part of a rebuild and may retire. And we have no business at all paying a declining older player that kind of money when we can save like $8M and give younger guys an opportunity. That’s all it means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Correct.  He will be cut, and that was agreed upon.

Greg wasn't going to retire (at this point) to make sure they wouldn't come after any of his money, not that Hurney would have anyway.

 

I don’t think he’s ready to hang them up quite yet, this wasn’t about money for Greg 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CBDellinger said:

yeah, I dont see him going to play for anything less than a legit contender.

Not that you can carry success over year to year, and not that he would wait this long to sign a TV contract, but the only way I see him back is if Kelce went down in the offseason or in the SB or something like that.

Otherwise, expect to see his Thor looking ass staring back at your through your TV this fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...