Cam having problem with the wimminz?

[JawnyBlaze]

9 minutes ago, bobowilson said:

There's something wrong about modern society where we look down upon having a lot of children.

It's what we're meant to do, especially if you can afford it.

Genghis Khan had thousands of childrens and was looked favorably upon for it.

 

Eh, this is a whole nother discussion lol. But I have to disagree. The world is overpopulated. We should be replacing ourselves at most, not adding to the problem. (For the record, I have no problem with Cam having a bunch of kids, or anyone with the means to support them. I only disagree in general theory.)

[TheMostInterestingMan]

1 minute ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Eh, this is a whole nother discussion lol. But I have to disagree. The world is overpopulated. We should be replacing ourselves at most, not adding to the problem. (For the record, I have no problem with Cam having a bunch of kids, or anyone with the means to support them. I only disagree in general theory.)

Yep. I’m not trying to be “high and mighty” nor do I fault anyone who has lots of kids (my parents have 4)

But having tons of children is becoming environmentally irresponsible. Especially when you look at the line of kids needing adoption that will ultimately be kicked out of the system at 18 with no family to speak of. 
 

Again. Not bashing Cam or anyone else that has lots of kids. I know it can be the biggest blessing in ones life. But I personally won’t have any children. If I do decide I want kids, I reckon adoption with be the route I take 

[morgan55]

16 minutes ago, bobowilson said:

There's something wrong about modern society where we look down upon having a lot of children.

It's what we're meant to do, especially if you can afford it.

Genghis Khan had thousands of childrens and was looked favorably upon for it.

 

Yea your right... fug the kids they don’t need a daddy

[XOBlackxJokerOX]

5 minutes ago, morgan55 said:

Yea your right... fug the kids they don’t need a daddy

 

[bobowilson]

14 minutes ago, morgan55 said:

Yea your right... fug the kids they don’t need a daddy

Watch his youtube videos

He's very active with his children

Also his children will all be rich and have great opportunities

[Harbingers]

39 minutes ago, bobowilson said:

There's something wrong about modern society where we look down upon having a lot of children.

It's what we're meant to do, especially if you can afford it.

Genghis Khan had thousands of childrens and was looked favorably upon for it.

 

Troll bot. 

[onmyown]

Subjective. Kids annoy the fug out of me. What’s more annoying is people who can’t drive hold a job or even make a meal without the drive through have 10 kids, can’t parent worth a poo then scream it’s their right to procreate but someone need a license to drive a car, sorry you don’t have a right to fug up peoples lives and harm everything around you as 1/3 of their kids end up in jail another 1/3 do the same poo the parents did and if we’re lucky 1/3 will be normal.

Forgot the fact that the majority of people literally can’t emotionally, physically or financially take care of more than 3-4 kids adequately, and by no means do I mean anything fancy.

its the stupid and poor people breeding and the smart ones who steer clear due to the stupid ones lol  that’s the problem, feel free to google that epidemic

that said, and said again...it’s subjective. The issue is generally the people having a poo ton of kids are smart enough to know any better, they don’t stop to really think long and hard and through what they’re capable of and understand what could happen will happen vs. what should happen.

some can raise a bunch and do it well, I’ve seen it. But I think people seem to believe it’s more common than it actually is. It isn’t. It’s rare.

im 34 and will not have kids. I can support them but I know my limits and I don’t fee it’s my right to breed if I can’t raise them properly.

/rant