Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In the last 30 years only three QBs picked number one overall have won a SB. Stop this Burrow talk.


PanthersNC1984

Recommended Posts

Just now, rayzor said:

What I'm seeing too. Hard to stop. We just have to hit them when they show up. Got a few of us watching so they we'll keep swatting.

yeah it's literally 1 or 2 button clicks to flag as spammer and delete a history, it takes way longer to register a new account than to ban it so that makes it actually kinda fun to watch them wasting their night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rodeo said:

yeah it's literally 1 or 2 button clicks to flag as spammer and delete a history, it takes way longer to register a new account than to ban it so that makes it actually kinda fun to watch them wasting their night.

Glad you guys are on it. I guess he didn't like that I defended cam. He has posted a pic of a dildo to my profile five times already haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PanthersNC1984 said:

Initially I was on the trade for Burrow train, but upon further review, Cincy can have him. I went back and did some research and guess what. Three yes ONLY three QBs that were picked number 1 overall in the last thirty years have gone on and won a SB. Eli and Peyton Manning and Drew Bledsoe. That’s it! Guess what?! I know this will blow your mind but you can win with a QB picked after the first overall pick and still have great success. OMG, like what a revelation guys! Rodgers, Lamar Jackson, Brees, Mahomes, Nick Foles for god sakes.. the list goes on and on, you can have a great QB that isn’t picked number one overall. 

This is a poor analysis. If your gonna say only 3 of those guys have won the super bowl over the last 30 years you have to also somehow how many number 1 picks made it to the super bowl and lost, made the playoffs. Then to give context show the same numbers for the number 2 pick, and on down. So are you saying a quarterback picked 17th has better odds at winning a super bowl thannumebr 1?

The situation your trying to present holds no weight on if a player wins the super bowl or not seeing as a million different other factors go into super bowls,teams around them Injuries and your odds every year are what 1 out of 32. Stop this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bull123 said:

Von Miller, julio Jones, jj watt, cam Jordan, and Patrick Peterson all went after cam 

wouldn’t say he was far and away the best at #1

For who we were and what we needed he absolutely was. Alternative was Clausen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bull123 said:

Ok...good point

I mean for QB aside from Cam that was a horrible year. Yo Gabba Gabba was the other choice in the draft and we were talking about going out and getting a dinosaur like Billy Volek in FA. 

We were rebuilding. Cam just made too much sense at #1 above all the other choices.

We're in a pretty crappy situation right now as far as key personnel goes, but I'm trusting the incoming coaching staff to do a lot more with less.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone might as well give it up now.

just being objective here but if I were the new coach and GM of the Bengals and I traded out of the first pick for Cam Newton— Cam had better look like MVP Cam for the foreseeable future and Burrows had better be Johnny Football part 2. 
 

For the panthers to make that trade, they would have to.
 

A— convince Cam Newton not to retire if we trade him to a worst team than ours.

B— we would have to convince Cinci that Cam looks like MVP Cam even if he doesn’t.

C— we have to convince Cinci that we think it’s ok to trade MVP Cam to them, jee like why wouldn’t we want him?

D— they probably would want Cam, and more picks if all the above is true.

E—buy the ownership of Cinci a whole lot of Ruffies so they can be convinced and wake up afterwards not believing they actually did it.

F— we are crazy— why wouldn’t they want Burrows?

its not happening folks.

Drop it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

There is no way in hell we are going to get Burrow.  Period.

I tend to agree with this. Plus, it would take a king’s ransom and we have too many needs right now. If we’re moving from Cam, I’d rather take a flyer on a guy like Bridgewater, who has experience in a like system, and rebuild the lines. If we have the opportunity to take an Eason or Love later in the draft, fine, take them and sit them. I really believe we’re in a multi-year process now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is a classic case of cherry picking stats to fit your narrative, also, the exact reason casinos have a history board on the roulette wheel. the careers of every other player ever drafted are independent from the career of burrow, or whoever is drafted #1. this statistic is completely useless when predicting the career of any player, inclining burrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...