Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jacob Eason


Shocker

Recommended Posts

Posting this before the combine and all the offseason eval but I am fairly sure I want to secure his services.  Whether we keep Cam or not he would be an amazing draft pick, yeah even at 7.  Love the moxie and amazing arm talent.  Go get him Hurney.  He is my #2 QB in this draft all thing considered.

Bash away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Shocker said:

Edited it...I cant post about QB without mentioning the best player in franchise history 

I’m not married to anyone in the draft because ultimately my opinion is irrelevant and whoever the team decides to pick, I will 100% get behind and support.

I’m not one of the infamous “Cam fans” nor am I one of the “Cam haters” and I can be at peace with the idea that we are moving on from him.

However, if I had it my way, I would be drafting Brown or the best available OT in the first round, let Cam play out this season and decide to keep him or move on based on this seasons performance and health. 
 

If Eason is the pick, I’ll be cheering the dude on and watching virtually every interview of him that exists on YouTube. But this is definitely not my ideal draft pick going in. I really hope it doesn’t happen.

I’m not pooing on your opinion. Just poking fun at the term moxie based on its overuse by people like Snake over the course of this last season. Can’t wait to see ‘moxie’ as an attribute in the next madden

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ezrider1423 said:

... dat moxie tho!! :tongue: Huge arm but needs to learn to step up in the pocket 

I hate responding to morons but that “bad Utah” tape is crazy.  He was hit consistently at his legs and played well outside of 2 throws.  This guy is talented as hell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

I’m not married to anyone in the draft because ultimately my opinion is irrelevant and whoever the team decides to pick, I will 100% get behind and support.

I’m not one of the infamous “Cam fans” nor am I one of the “Cam haters” and I can be at peace with the idea that we are moving on from him.

However, if I had it my way, I would be drafting Brown or the best available OT in the first round, let Cam play out this season and decide to keep him or move on based on this seasons performance and health. 
 

If Eason is the pick, I’ll be cheering the dude on and watching virtually every interview of him that exists on YouTube. But this is definitely not my ideal draft pick going in. I really hope it doesn’t happen.

I’m not pooing on your opinion. Just poking fun at the term moxie based on its overuse by people like Snake over the course of this last season. Can’t wait to see ‘moxie’ as an attribute in the next madden

I appreciate the post...when I say moxie I mean the guy believes in his ability.  Cocky is good.  He has that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...